For many years, Atwood’s machine has been used to demonstrate, illustrate, or verify Newton’s laws in introductory physics courses. It consists of two objects of different mass that are fastened to the ends of a string that hangs over a pulley. In an idealized situation, one assumes that pulley friction, the string’s mass, and changes in the string’s length are negligible. Cases in which the pulley’s mass is non-negligible may be considered. Advanced students can investigate non-ideal cases in which the string’s mass or friction is not negligible or cases in which the masses swing. Computer-based data acquisition tools allow quick and accurate measurements of the acceleration of the objects in the Atwood machine. They enable an instructor to ask probing questions regarding this apparatus while quickly verifying its prevailing physical principles through simple measurements. Two interesting questions that one can ask are:

  • Question (1): “What is the acceleration of the objects in an Atwood machine when both objects are of equal mass with one being an unraveling spool?”

  • Question (2): “Is it possible to determine a mass ratio in which the acceleration of the spool is non-zero while the acceleration of the other object is zero?”

1.
Thomas B.
Greenslade
, “
Atwood’s machine
,”
Phys. Teach.
23
,
24
28
(Jan.
1985
).
2.
Irving L.
Kofsky
, “
Atwood’s machine and the teaching of Newton’s second law
,”
Am. J. Phys.
19
,
354
356
(Sept.
1951
).
3.
Carl E.
Mungan
, “
Atwood’s machine without hanging masses
,”
J. Wash. Acad. Sci.
91
,
15
24
(Winter
2005
).
4.
Dany
Lopez
,
Isidora
Caprile
,
Fernando
Corvacho
, and
Orfa
Reyes
, “
Study of a variable mass Atwood’s machine using a smartphone
,”
Phys. Teach.
56
,
182
183
(March
2018
).
5.
Mariusz
Tarnopolski
, “
On Atwood’s machine with nonzero mass string
,”
Phys. Teach.
53
,
494
496
(Nov.
2015
).
6.
Eric C.
Martell
and
Verda Beth
Martell
, “
The effect of friction in pulleys on the tension in cables and strings
,”
Phys. Teach.
51
,
98
100
(Feb.
2013
).
7.
Nicolas B.
Tufillaro
,
Tyler A.
Abbott
, and
David J.
Griffiths
, “
Swinging Atwood’s machine
,”
Am. J. Phys.
52
,
895
390
(Oct.
1984
).
9.
Ricardo
Trumper
and
Moshe
Gelbman
, “
TEACHING PHYSICS: A computer-based revitalization of Atwood’s machine
,”
Phys. Educ.
35
,
354
358
(Sept.
2000
).
10.
A detailed version of this derivation that includes the effect of the pulley mass can be viewed in an appendix at TPT Online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.5145408, under the Supplemental tab. Alternative derivations of Eq. (5) are also presented for the interested reader.
11.
Daniel
Kleppner
and
Robert
Kolenkow
,
An Introduction to Mechanics
, 2nd ed. (
Cambridge Press
,
Cambridge
,
2014
), pp.
269
273 and 281
–284.
12.
PASCO scientific
, https://www.pasco.com/file_downloads/Downloads_Manuals/Super-Pulley-Kit-Manual-ME-9433.pdf.
The original manual for the Smart Pulley is out of print
.
13.
A solid plastic cylinder of radius 2.86 cm and length 6.40 cm was also used. Because of its small diameter, it was somewhat difficult to track with the motion sensor. The theoretical and measured accelerations for this spool were 4.92 m/s2 and 4.6±0.3 m/s2. Overall, the PVC tube provided more consistent results than the metal cylinder.

Supplementary Material

AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.