Work, kinetic energy (KE), and potential energy (PE) are key physics concepts, taught in essentially every introductory physics course along with the physical laws such as the work-kinetic energy theorem and the conservation of mechanical energy, which describe how the values of those quantities change during various processes. Quite appropriately for introductory courses, little attention is paid to how those concepts play out when implemented via observations in reference frames moving with respect to each other.
References
1.
A. J.
Mallinckrodt
and Harvey S.
Leff
, “All about work
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
, 356
–365
(April
1992
).2.
Rodolfo A.
Diaz
, William J.
Herrera
, and Diego A.
Manjarrés
, “Work and energy in inertial and noninertial reference frames
,” Am. J. Phys.
77
, 270
–273
(March
2009
).3.
Saeed
Ghanbari
, “Mechanical energy change in inertial reference frames
,” Phys. Teach.
54
, 360
–363
(Sept.
2016
).4.
Edw S.
Ginsberg
, “Simple examples of the interpretation of changes in kinetic and potential energy under Galilean transformations
,” Phys. Teach.
56
, 96
–99
(Feb.
2018
).Editor’s note: See also the letter to the editor in this issue of TPT from
E.
Ginsburg
, “Galilean invariance of potential energy,” Phys. Teach.
57
, 4
(Jan.
2019
).5.
F. C.
Santos
, V.
Soares
, and A. C.
Tort
, “A note on the conservation of mechanical energy and the Galilean principle of relativity
,” Eur. J. Phys.
31
, 827
–834
(July
2010
).6.
Brandon J.
Tefft
and James A.
Tefft
, “Galilean relativity and the work-kinetic energy theorem
,” Phys. Teach.
45
, 218
–220
(April
2007
).7.
8.
Customarily, we describe quantities such as mass and electric charge that do not change under Galilean transformations as “invariants.” The term “covariant” is often used for laws that are form invariant under transformations among frames of reference. In this paper, we avoid that term since it is not needed and, if used, might cause confusion since it also denotes certain vector and tensor indices and certain kinds of derivatives in special and general relativity. The term is also linked to covariance in statistics.
9.
Rachel E.
Scherr
, Hunter G.
Close
, Sarah B.
McKagan
, and Stamatis
Vokos
, “Representing energy. I. Representing a substance ontology for energy
,” Phys. Rev. ST-Phys. Educ. Res.
8
, 020114-1
–11
(Oct.
2012
).10.
Rachel E.
Scherr
, Hunter G.
Close
, Eleanor W.
Close
, and Stamatis
Vokos
, “Representing energy. II. Energy tracking representations
,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
8
, 020115-1
–11
(Oct.
2012
).11.
Benjamin W.
Dreyfus
, Benjamin D.
Geller
, Julia
Gouvea
, Vashti
Sawtelle
, Chandra
Turpen
, and Edward F.
Redish
, “Ontological metaphors for negative energy in an interdisciplinary context
,” Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res
10
, 020108-1
–11
(July
2014
).© 2019 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2019
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.