In this paper we describe an activity for engaging students in crafting definitions. We explore the strengths of this particular activity as well as the broader implications of engaging students in crafting definitions more generally.
References
1.
Sandwiches: Tax Bulletin ST-835 (TB-ST-835), New York State Department of Taxation and Finance
, https://www.tax.ny.gov/pubs_and_bulls/tg_bulletins/st/sandwiches.htm (2011
), accessed March 18, 2017.2.
If you would like to hear more about the New York sandwich debates, see this Sporkful Podcast episode where they debate whether or not hot dog counts as a sandwich: http://www.sporkful.com/john-hodgman-v-dan-pashman-are-hot-dogs-sandwiches/ (
2015
), accessed March 18, 2017.3.
A. H.
Schoenfeld
, “Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense-Making in Mathematics,” in Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning
, edited by D.
Grouws
, (Macmillan
, New York
, 1992
), pp. 334
–370
.4.
C.
Bazerman
, Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science
(University of Wisconsin Press
, Madison
, 1988
), p. 164
.5.
L. J.
Atkins
and I.Y.
Salter
, “Constructing definitions as a goal of inquiry
,” AIP Conf. Proc.
1289
(1
), 65
–68
(2010
).6.
The idea of focusing on physical patterns like “threshold” draws on work by Andrea diSessa’s Patterns Research Group at the University of California, Berkeley.
7.
“Defining: Constructing precise ideas,” http://www.composingscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Ch-8-Definitions.pdf.
8.
Depending on time and context, students could be encouraged to put together a real website or YouTube video on thresholds for their younger siblings, cousins, children, etc.
9.
A.
Little
, An Empirical Study of the Process of Crafting and Using Definitions
(ProQuest Dissertations Publishing
, 2013
).10.
11.
A.
Elby
, “Helping physics students learn how to learn
,” Am. J. Phys.
69
(S1
), S54
–S64
(July
2001
).12.
L. J.
Atkins
and I. Y.
Salter
, “Engaging Future Teachers in Having Wonderful Ideas,” in Recruiting and Educating Future Physics Teachers: Case Studies and Effective Practices
, edited by E.
Brewe
and C.
Sandifer
(American Physical Society
, College Park, MD
, 2015
).13.
M.
Zaandieh
and C.
Rasmussen
, “Defining as a mathematical activity: A framework for characterizing progress from informal to more formal ways of reasoning
,” J. Math. Beh.
29
(2
), 57
–75
(2010
).14.
L. C.
McDermott
, P. S.
Shaffer
, and the Physics Education Group at the University of
Washington
, Tutorials in Introductory Physics
, 1st ed. (Prentice Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ
, 2002
).15.
I. A.
Halloun
and D.
Hestenes
, “Modeling instruction in mechanics
,” Am. J. Phys.
55
, 455
–462
(May
1987
).16.
E.
Brewe
, “Modeling theory applied: Modeling instruction in introductory physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
76
, 1155
–1160
(Dec.
2008
).17.
L. C.
McDermott
and the Physics Education Research Group at the University of
Washington
, Physics by Inquiry: An Introduction to the Physical Sciences
(Wiley
, New York
, 1996
).18.
NGSS Lead States
, Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States
(National Academies Press
, Washington, DC
, 2013
).© 2018 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2018
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
