Abundant research leaves little question that pedagogical approaches involving active student engagement with the material, and opportunities for student-to-student discussions, lead to much better learning outcomes than traditional instructor-led, expository instructional formats, in physics and in many other fields. In introductory college physics classes, some departments have departed radically from conventional lecture-recitation-laboratory course structures, but many, including my own, retain the basic format of large-group classroom sessions (lectures) supplemented by smaller-group meetings focused on problem solving (recitations) and separate laboratory meetings. Active student engagement in the lectures is encouraged through approaches such as Peer Instruction and Interactive Lecture Demonstrations, and these approaches have been demonstrably successful.

1.
J. L.
Doktor
and
J. P.
Mestre
, “
Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
10
,
020119
(
2014
).
2.
D. E.
Meltzer
and
R. K.
Thornton
, “
Resource Letter ALIP-1: Active-learning instruction in physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
80
,
478
496
(
June
2012
).
3.
A.
Van Heuvelen
, “
Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies
,”
Am. J. Phys.
59
,
891
897
(
Oct.
1991
).
4.
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Oersted Medal 2001: Physics education research – The key to student learning
,”
Am. J. Phys.
69
,
1127
1137
(
Nov.
2001
).
5.
L. C.
McDermott
, “
Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned – Closing the gap
,”
Am. J. Phys.
59
,
301
315
(
April
1991
).
6.
R. R.
Hake
, “
Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
64
74
(
Jan.
1998
).
7.
S.
Freeman
,
S. L.
Eddy
,
M.
McDonough
,
M. K.
Smith
,
N.
Okoroafor
,
H.
Jordt
, and
M. P.
Wenderoth
, “
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering and mathematics
,”
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
111
,
8410
8415
(
June
10,
2014
).
8.
E.
Mazur
,
Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual
(
Prentice-Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
,
1997
).
9.
C. H.
Crouch
and
E.
Mazur
, “
Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results
,”
Am. J. Phys.
69
,
970
977
(
Sept.
2001
).
10.
D. R.
Sokoloff
and
R. K.
Thornton
, “
Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment
,”
Phys. Teach.
35
,
340
346
(
Sept.
1997
).
11.
K. M.
Koenig
,
R. J.
Endorf
, and
G. A.
Braun
, “
Effectiveness of different tutorial recitation teaching methods and its implications for TA training
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
3
,
010104
(
2007
).
12.
L. C.
McDermott
and
P. F.
Shaffer
,
Tutorials in Introductory Physics
(
Prentice Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002
).
14.
R. J.
Dufresne
,
W. J.
Gerace
, and
W. J.
Leonard
, “
Solving physics problems with multiple representations
,”
Phys. Teach.
35
,
270
275
(
May
1997
).
15.
P. B.
Kohl
,
D.
Rosengrant
, and
N. D.
Finkelstein
, “
Strongly and weakly directed approaches to teaching multiple representation use in physics
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
3
,
010108
(
2007
).
16.
L.
Hsu
,
E.
Brewe
,
T. M.
Foster
, and
K. A.
Harper
, “
Resource Letter RPS-1: Research in problem-solving
,”
Am. J. Phys.
72
,
1147
1156
(
Sept.
2004
).
17.
M. T. H.
Chi
,
P. J.
Feltovich
, and
R.
Glaser
, “
Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices
,”
Cogn. Sci.
5
,
121
152
(
April
1981
).
18.
J.
Larkin
, “
Cognition of learning physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
49
,
534
541
(
June
1981
).
19.
J.
Larkin
,
J.
McDermott
,
D. P.
Simon
, and
H. A.
Simon
, “
Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems
,”
Sci.
208
,
1335
1342
(
June
20,
1980
).
20.
F.
Reif
, “
Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes
,”
Am. J. Phys.
63
,
17
32
(
Jan.
1995
).
21.
L. N.
Walsh
,
R. G.
Howard
, and
B.
Bowe
, “
Phenomenographic study of students’ problem solving approaches in physics
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
3
,
020108
(
2007
).
22.
A.
Van Heuvelen
, “
Millikan Lecture 2000: The workplace, student minds, and physics learning systems
,”
Am. J. Phys.
69
,
1139
1146
(
Nov.
2001
).
23.
P. B.
Kohl
and
N. D.
Finkelstein
, “
Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
4
,
010111
(
2008
).
24.
P. B.
Kohl
and
N. D.
Finkelstein
, “
Effects of representation on students solving physics problems: A fine-grained characterization
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
2
,
010106
(
2006
).
25.
J. I.
Heller
and
F.
Reif
, “
Prescribing effective human problem-solving processes: Problem description in physics
,”
Cogn. Instruct.
1
,
177
216
(
March
1984
).
26.
D. S.
Wright
and
C. D.
Williams
, “
A WISE strategy for introductory physics
,”
Phys. Teach.
24
,
211
216
(
April
1986
).
27.
P.
Heller
and
M.
Hollabaugh
, “
Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
,
637
644
(
July
1992
).
28.
P.
Heller
,
R.
Keith
, and
S.
Anderson
, “
Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
,
627
636
(
July
1992
).
29.
R.
Taconis
,
M. G. M.
Ferguson-Hessler
, and
H.
Broekkamp
, “
Teaching science problem-solving
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
38
,
442
468
(
March
2001
).
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.