In Benjamin Franklin’s one fluid theory of electrification, ordinary unelectrified matter consisted of a matrix of matter suffused with a certain amount of “electrical fluid.” Electrical effects were due to an excess or deficit of electrical fluid, hence the terms positive and negative. Before the development of a modern view of the atom, diagrams showing charged objects would simply have “+” or “–” signs to indicate the charged state. As physicists we know how to interpret these diagrams and understand what they are telling us about the underlying atomic model of charging. However, novice students may not readily make the connection between the atomic model, in which a charged solid object either gains or loses electrons but does not gain or lose positive charges. Furthermore, when isolated objects become charged, the total number of electrons must be accounted for as charge is a conserved quantity. To really understand the changes that occur in charging by contact, conduction, or induction, it is useful for students to visually represent the processes in a way that emphasizes the atomicity of the processes, including the induced polarization of objects, and the requirement that charge be conserved.
Simple Pencil-and-Paper Notation for Representing Electrical Charge States
Robert A. Morse holds a BA in physics from Cornell University and a PhD in science education from the University of Maryland. He taught high school physics in public and private schools, retiring in 2012 after 30 years at St. Albans School. He is the author of the AAPT/PTRA manuals Teaching About Electrostatics and Teaching About Newton’s Second Law. His laboratory manual Ben Franklin as My Lab Partner and an extensive collection of Franklin’s writing on electricity can be found at http://www.compadre.org/psrc/Franklin, including directions to repeat many of Franklin’s experiments using inexpensive modern materials.
Robert A. Morse; Simple Pencil-and-Paper Notation for Representing Electrical Charge States. Phys. Teach. 1 November 2017; 55 (8): 470–471. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5008339
Download citation file: