Even after you have decided to tackle a problem like racial equity, it may seem daunting to broach the subject in a physics classroom. After all, the idea of a (typically White) instructor in power tackling a sensitive topic such as social justice can be scary in any (mostly White) classroom. Not only that, but physics is typically viewed as a “culture with no culture.” The physicist’s quest for objectivity, along with a general focus on a fixed set of laws and formulae, support the treatment of this subject as untouched by people. Sometimes it is easier to ignore the problem and just focus on the Conservation of Energy Principle. However, ignoring the striking underrepresentation of ethnic/racial minorities and women in both the physics classroom and the field at large is a great disservice to all our students. We take the position that the persistence of representation disparities in physics is evidence that culture plays a role in who and what is involved in physics. Instructors have an opportunity to explicitly address the absence of equitable circumstances in classrooms and highlight the obstacles that contribute to the disparity (e.g., varied access to learning opportunities and support structures, dominant cultural norms, stereotype threat, implicit bias, hidden curricula, etc.). We acknowledge that incorporating these discussions in a physics classroom is fraught with difficulty, but we also believe that trying to lead these discussions is better than ignoring the problem. Furthermore, a set of resources for teachers interested in leading these discussions has been developing in the physics teacher community. Rifkin offers resources for leading a two-week unit on equity designed for secondary science classrooms. Here we describe another possible pathway for integrating a shorter equity unit into the traditional content of a (predominantly White) university physics classroom, addressing racial inequity and sharing common student responses that may arise.

1.
S.
Traweek
,
Beamtimes and Lifetimes
(
Harvard University Press
,
2009
).
2.
L.
Merner
,
African American Participation among Bachelors in the Physical Sciences and Engineering
(
AIP Statistical Research Center
,
2015
), pp.
1
9
.
3.
L.
Merner
,
Hispanic Participation Among Bachelor’s in the Physical Sciences and Engineering
(
AIP Statistical Research Center
,
2014
), pp.
1
9
.
4.
C.
Hill
,
Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women’s Success in Engineering and Computing
, http://www.aauw.org/research/solving-the-equation (
2015
).
5.
R. M.
Lock
and
Z.
Hazari
, “
Discussing underrepresentation as a means to facilitating female students’ physics identity development
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
12
,
020101
(
2016
).
6.
M.
Rifkin
, “
Addressing underrepresentation: Physics teaching for all
,”
Phys. Teach.
54
,
72
(
Feb.
2016
).
7.
Though gender inequity is also a possible pathway, we chose to focus on racial inequities for this particular unit.
8.
J.
Hatton
and
P. B.
Plouffe
,
Science and Its Ways of Knowing
(
Addison-Wesley
,
1997
).
9.
An Open Letter to SCOTUS From Professional Physicists
,” retrieved from http://eblur.github.io/scotus/,
May
10
,
2017
.
10.
C.M.
Steele
, “
A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance
,”
Am. Psychol.
52
,
613
(
1997
).
11.
C.M.
Steele
, “
Stereotype Threat: A Conversation with Claude Steele
” (YouTube, 2013) retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=failylROnrY},
May
10
,
2017
.
12.
K.
Ratliff
,
Y.
Bar-Anan
,
B.
Gurion
,
C.T.
Smith
,
C.B.
Hawkins
,
B.A.
Nosek
,
T.
Greenwald
, and
University of Washington
, editors, “
Project Implicit
” retrieved from https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html,
May
10
,
2017
.
13.
P.
McIntosh
, “
White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack
,”
Peace and Freedom Mag.
,
10
12
(
1989
), retrieved from https://nationalseedproject.org/white-privilege-unpacking-the-invisible-knapsack,
May
10
,
2016
.
14.
A. J.
Gonsalves
,
A.
Danielsson
, and
H.
Pettersson
, “
Masculinities and experimental practices in physics: The view from three case studies
,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.
12
,
47
(
2016
).
15.
Students were randomly assigned to a number between 100 and 9999.
16.
S.
White
and
J.
Tyler
,
Underrepresented Minorities in High School Physics
(
AIP Statistical Research Center
,
2015
), pp.
1
7
.
17.
What Is a Gallery Walk
,” retrieved from https://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/gallerywalk/what.html,
July
14
,
2017
.
18.
S.
Decker
and
A.R.
Daane
, (under review) in
2017 PERC
(
American Association of Physics Teachers
,
2017
).
19.
A.R.
Daane
and
V.
Sawtelle
, “Student discourse about equity in an introductory college physics course,” in
2016 PERC
(
American Association of Physics Teachers
,
2016
), pp.
88
91
.
20.
S.
Fries-Britt
,
J.
Johnson
, and
B.
Burt
,
Black Students in Physics: the Intersection of Academic Ability, Race, Gender, and Class
(Living at the intersections: Social identities and black …,
2013
).
21.
A.C.
Johnson
, “
Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color
,”
Sci. Ed.
91
,
805
(
2007
).
22.
B.
Applebaum
, “Critical Whiteness Studies,”
Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education
(
June
2016
).
23.
PERCoGS
, editor,
Winter 2017 AAPT Professional Skill Session Speakers’ Bibliography
(n.d.).
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.