“Parallel” pedagogy covers the four mechanics concepts of momentum, energy, forces, and kinematics simultaneously instead of building each concept on an understanding of the previous one. Course content is delivered through interactive videos, allowing class time for group work and student-centered activities. We start with simple examples, building complexity throughout the course with the introduction of springs, two dimensions, vectors, energy diagrams, universal gravitation, and rotation. Success means that students ponder underlying physics concepts rather than hunt for formulas. Surveys indicate that students accept this learning model well and have considerable improvement in applied conceptual understanding.

1.
David
Hammer
, “
Two approaches to learning physics
,”
Phys. Teach.
27
,
664
670
(
Dec.
1989
).
3.
Paul
D’Alessandris
, “SPIRALPhysics Active Learning,”
National Science Foundation, Curriculum and Faculty Development Newsletter for Two Year College and High School Physics Educators
(
Spring
2007
), http://web.monroecc.edu/manila/webfiles/spiral/SpiralArticle.pdf.
4.
A.
Van Huevelen
, “
Overview, case study physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
59
,
898
907
(
Oct.
1991
).
5.
P. C.
Brown
,
H. I.
Roediger
 III
, and
M. A.
McDaniel
,
Make it Stick: The Science of Successful Learning
(
Belknap Press
,
2014
).
6.
Where students are introduced to new material at home and use class time for solving problems. For instance, see
L.
Deslauriers
,
E.
Schelew
, and
C.
Weiman
, “
Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class
,”
Sci.
332
,
862
864
(
May
2011
).
7.
The free online parallel pedagogy textbook should be available at OpenStax.org in July 2017 and is presently available at http://sharedcurriculum.wikispaces.com/Textbook+-+Mechanics+in+Parallel.
8.
This rubric can be found on the course syllabus at http://sharedcurriculum.wikispaces.com/Syllabus+141+Spring+2016.
9.
J.
Haugan
,
M.
Lysebo
,
P.
Lauvas
, “
Mandatory coursework assignments can be, and should be eliminated!
Eur. J. Eng. Educ.
,
1
14
, (
March
21
,
2017
); published online at .
10.
W. K.
Adams
,
K. K.
Perkins
,
N. S.
Podolefsky
,
M.
Dubson
,
N. D.
Finkelstein
, and
C. E.
Wieman
, “
A new instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
2
,
010101
(
Jan.
2006
).
11.
The 63 students who took the pre- and post-test averaged 2.5 6 0.8 (out of 4.0) on the final exam. The entire class of 93 students who took the final exam averaged 2.4 6 0.7 (out of 4.0).
12.
Pronounced “See-Lass.” Available at http://www.colorado.edu/sei/class/.
13.
Comprehensive results can be accessed from the spring 2016 class website: http://sharedcurriculum.wikispaces.com/Introductory+Mechanics+Spring+2016.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.