Generally speaking, students have difficulty reporting out measurements and estimates of quantities used in the laboratory, and with handling the significant figures associated with them. When required to make calculation involving quantities with different numbers of significant figures, they have difficulty in assigning the corresponding digits to the final result. When in addition, the quantities have uncertainty, the operations entailed pose an even greater challenge. The article advocates for some working rules for students (and teachers) in an effort to combat this problem.

1.
E. P.
Guymon
, “
Teaching significant figures using a learning cycle
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
63
(
9
),
786
87
(
1986
).
2.
D. M.
Graham
, “
Significant figures in graph interpretation
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
73
(
3
),
211
213
(
1996
).
3.
J. R.
Taylor
,
An Introduction to Error Analysis
(
University Science Books
,
Sausalito, CA
,
1997
).
4.
R. A.
Pacer
, “
How can an instructor best introduce the topic of significant figures to students unfamiliar with the concept?
J. Chem. Educ.
77
(
11
),
1435
38
(
2000
).
5.
S.
Allie
,
A.
Buffler
,
B.
Campbell
,
F.
Lubben
,
D.
Evangelinos
,
D.
Psillos
, and
O.
Valassiades
, “
Teaching measurement in the introductory physics laboratory
,”
Phys. Teach.
41
,
394
400
(
Oct.
2003
).
6.
A.
Buffler
,
S.
Allie
, and
F.
Lubben
, “
Teaching measurement and uncertainty the GUM way
,”
Phys. Teach.
46
,
539
543
(
Dec.
2008
).
7.
W. K.
Stephenson
, “
The Box-and-Dot Method: A simple strategy for counting significant figures
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
86
(
8
),
933
935
(
2009
).
8.
A. R.
Carter
, “
Evolution of the significant figure rules
,”
Phys. Teach.
51
,
340
343
(
Sept.
2013
).
9.
D. C.
Baird
,
Experimentation: An Introduction to Measurement Theory and Experiment Design
(
Prentice Hall
,
1991
).
10.
S. K.
Kimothi
,
The Uncertainty of Measurements: Physical and Chemical Metrology and Analysis
(
ASQ Quality Press
,
Milwaukee, WI
,
2002
).
11.
N. G.
Holmes
and
D. A.
Bonn
, “
Quantitative comparisons to promote inquiry in the introductory physics laboratory
,”
Phys. Teach.
53
,
352
(
Sept.
2015
).
12.
B. N.
Taylor
and
E. C.
Kuyatt
, Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results,
National Institute of Standards and Technology
(
U.S. Government Printing Office
,
Washington, DC
,
1994
), https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/pml/pubs/tn1297/tn1297s.pdf.
13.
G. L.
Squires
,
Practical Physics
(
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
1976
).
14.
L. M.
Schwartz
, “
Propagation of significant figures
,”
J. Chem. Educ.
62
(
8
),
693
697
(
1985
).
15.
L. S.
Morgan
, “
Tutorial on the Use of Significant Figures
,”
University of South Carolina
, http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/PHYS/marzoug/Phys101/Significant_Figures.pdf.
16.
Rubén J.
Lazos-Martínez
,
Mediciones confiables en la práctica de la Ingeniería, Centro Nacional de Metrología
,
El Marqués, Querétaro
,
Mexico
(
2006
), http://www.cenam.mxpublicaciones/gratuitas/.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.