Thinking in Physics (TIP) is a new curriculum that is more effective than commonly used interactive engagement methods for students who have the greatest difficulty learning physics. Research has shown a correlation between learning in physics and other factors, including scientific reasoning ability. The TIP curriculum addresses those factors. Features of the curriculum and evidence of its effectiveness are described. The most recent version of the TIP curriculum has greatly reduced a substantial gender gap that previously existed. More details and sample materials are provided in Thinking in Physics, a book intended for instructors of introductory physics, published in 2014 by Pearson as part of its Educational Innovation series. Additional materials, both for students and instructors, are provided on the website http://thinkinginphysics.com. Both the book and the website are free.

1.
R. R.
Hake
, “
Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
64
(
Jan.
1998
).
2.
D.
Hestenes
,
M.
Wells
, and
G.
Swackhamer
, “
Force Concept Inventory
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
,
141
(
1992
). The 1995 revision by Halloun, Hake, Mosca, and Hestenes is the version most commonly used and the one referred to here.
3.
D.
Hestenes
and
M.
Wells
, “
A mechanics baseline test
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
,
159
(
1992
).
4.
R. R.
Hake
, “
Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains with gender, high school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization
,” http://www.physics.indiana.edu/∼hake/PERC2002h-Hake.pdf.
5.
A. E.
Lawson
, “
The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
15
,
11
(
Jan.
1978
). Revised ed. at http://lsweb.la.asu.edu/alwason/LawsonAssessments.htm.
6.
V. P.
Coletta
and
J. A.
Phillips
, “
Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability
,”
Am. J. Phys.
73
,
1172
(
Dec.
2005
).
7.
V. P.
Coletta
,
J. A.
Phillips
, and
J. J.
Steinert
, “
Interpreting Force Concept Inventory scores: Normalized gain and SAT scores
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ.
3
,
010106
(
May
2007
).
8.
V. P.
Coletta
,
J. A.
Phillips
, and
J. J.
Steinert
, “
Why you should measure your students’ reasoning ability
,”
Phys. Teach.
45
,
626
(
April
2007
).
9.
M. A.
Dubson
and
S. J.
Pollock
, “
Can the Lawson Test predict student grades
,”
AAPT Announ.
36
,
90
(
2006
).
10.
K.
Diff
and
N.
Tache
, “
From FCI to CSEM to Lawson Test: A report on data collected at a community college
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
951
,
85
(
Nov.
2007
).
11.
P.
Pamela
and
J.
Saul
, “
Interpreting FCI normalized gain
,”
AAPT Announ.
36
,
89
(
2006
).
12.
B. A.
Pyper
, “
Changing scientific reasoning and conceptual understanding in college students
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
1413
,
63
(
Feb.
2011
).
13.
P.
Nieminem
,
A.
Savinainen
, and
J.
Viiri
, “
Relations between representational consistency, conceptual understanding of the force concept, and scientific reasoning
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ.
8
,
01012
(
May
2012
).
14.
M.
Wells
,
D.
Hestenes
, and
G.
Swackhamer
, “
A modeling method for high school physics instruction
,”
Am. J. Phys.
63
,
606
(
July
1995
).
15.
V. P.
Coletta
and
J. A.
Phillips
, “
Addressing barriers to conceptual understanding in IE physics classes
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
1179
,
117
120
(
2009
).
16.
V. P.
Coletta
,
J. A.
Phillips
, and
J. J.
Steinert
, “
FCI normalized gain, scientific reasoning ability, thinking in physics, and gender effects
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
1413
,
23
(
2012
).
17.
A.
Miyake
 et al, “
Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation
,”
Sci.
330
,
1234
(
Nov.
2010
).
20.
R.
Hembree
, “
Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety
,”
Rev. Educ. Res.
58
,
47
(
1988
).
21.
E. M.
Evans
,
H.
Schweingruber
, and
H. W.
Stevenson
, “
Gender differences in interest and knowledge acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan
,”
Sex Roles
47
,
153
(
Aug.
2002
).
22.
V.
Coletta
,
Thinking in Physics
(
Pearson
,
Boston
,
2014
).
23.
C.
Wieman
and
S.
Gilbert
, “
The teaching practices inventory: A new tool for characterizing college and university teaching in mathematics and science
,”
CBE–Life Sci. Educ.
13
,
552
(
2014
).
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.