Students must learn effective problem solving strategies in order to develop expertise in physics. Effective problem solving strategies include a conceptual analysis of the problem followed by planning of the solution, and then implementation, evaluation, and reflection upon the process. Research suggests that converting a problem from the initial verbal representation to other suitable representation, e.g., diagrammatic representation, during the initial conceptual analysis can facilitate further analysis of the problem. But without guidance, many introductory physics students solve problems using superficial clues and cues and do not perceive problem solving as an opportunity for learning. Here, we describe a study that suggests that engaging students in reflection with peers about effective problem solving strategies while effective approaches are modeled for them and prompt feedback is provided may enhance desirable skills.

1.
F.
Reif
, “
Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes
,”
Am. J. Phys.
63
,
17
(
Jan.
1995
).
2.
D.
Maloney
, “
Research in Problem Solving: Physics
,” in
Handbook of Research on the Teaching and Learning of Science
, edited by D. Gabel (
MacMillan
,
New York
,
1994
).
3.
P.
Hardiman
,
R.
Dufresne
, and
J.
Mestre
, “
The relation between problem categorization and problem solving among novices and experts
,”
Mem. Cognition
17
,
627
(
1989
).
4.
J.
Morphew
,
J.
Mestre
,
B.
Ross
, and
N.
Strand
, “
Do experts and novices direct attention differently in examining physics diagrams? A study of change detection using the flicker technique
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
11
,
020104
(
2015
);
W.
Fakcharoenphol
,
J.
Morphew
, and
J.
Mestre
, “
Judgments of physics problem difficulty among experts and novices
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
11
,
020128
(
2015
).
5.
S. Y.
Lin
and
C.
Singh
, “
Using isomorphic problems to learn introductory physics
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
7
,
020104
(
2011
);
S. Y.
Lin
and
C.
Singh
, “
Challenges in using analogies
,”
Phys. Teach.
49
,
512
(
Nov.
2011
);
S. Y.
Lin
and
C.
Singh
, “
Effect of scaffolding on helping introductory physics students solve quantitative problems involving strong alternative conceptions
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
11
,
020105
(
2015
);
C.
Singh
, “
Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. I. Performance on a nonintuitive problem pair from introductory physics
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
4
,
010104
(
2008
).
6.
A.
Maries
and
C.
Singh
, “
A good diagram is valuable despite the choice of a mathematical approach to problem solving
” in
Proceedings of the 2013 Physics Education Research Conference
,
Portland, OR
, edited by
P.
Engelhardt
,
A.
Churukian
, and
D.
Jones
(
2014
), pp.
31
34
;
A.
Maries
and
C.
Singh
, “
To use or not to use diagrams: The effect of drawing a diagram in solving introductory physics problems
,” in
Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference
,
Philadelphia, PA
, edited by
P.
Engelhardt
,
A.
Churukian
, and
S.
Rebello
, (
AIP Conf. Proc.
,
Melville, NY
,
1513
,
282
285
(
2013
);
S. Y.
Lin
and
C.
Singh
, “
Using an isomorphic problem pair to learn introductory physics: Transferring from a two-step problem to a three-step problem
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
9
,
020114
(
2013
);
C.
Singh
, “
Assessing student expertise in introductory physics with isomorphic problems. II. Effect of some potential factors on problem solving and transfer
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
4
,
010105
(
2008
).
7.
A.
Mason
and
C.
Singh
, “
Helping students learn effective problem solving strategies by reflecting with peers
,”
Am. J. Phys.
78
,
748
(
July
2010
).
8.
A.
Collins
,
J.
Brown
, and
S.
Newman
, “
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics
,” in
Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser
, edited by
L. B.
Resnick
(
Lawrence Erlbaum
,
Hillsdale, NJ
,
1989
), pp.
453
494
.
9.
For example, see
J.
Docktor
and
J.
Mestre
, “
Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
10
,
020119
(
2014
).
10.
C.
Singh
, “
What can we learn from PER: Physics Education Research?
Phys. Teach.
52
,
568
(
Dec.
2015
).
11.
E.
Mazur
,
Peer Instruction: A User's Manua
l (
Prentice Hall
,
Upper Saddle River, NJ
,
1997
).
12.
P.
Heller
,
R.
Keith
, and
S.
Anderson
, “
Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part I: Group versus individual problem solving
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
,
627
(
July
1992
);
P.
Heller
and
M.
Hollabaugh
, “
Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
,
637
(
July
1992
).
13.
C.
Singh
, “
Impact of peer interaction on conceptual test performance
,”
Am. J. Phys.
73
,
446
(
May
2005
).
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.