MAUVE (magnitude, answer, units, variables, and equations) is a framework and rubric to help students and teachers through the process of clearly solving and assessing solutions to introductory physics problems. Success in introductory physics often derives from an understanding of units, a command over dimensional analysis, and good bookkeeping. I developed MAUVE for an introductory-level environmental physics course as an easy-to-remember checklist to help students construct organized and thoughtful solutions to physics problems. Environmental physics is a core physics course for environmental and sustainability science (ESS) majors that teaches principles of radiation, thermodynamics, and mechanics within the context of the environment and sustainable energy systems. ESS student concentrations include environmental biology, applied ecology, biogeochemistry, and natural resources. The MAUVE rubric, inspired by nature, has encouraged my students to produce legible and tactical work, and has significantly clarified the grading process.

1.
E.
Nalence
, “
More ideas about grading
,”
Phys. Teach.
49
,
198
199
(
April
2012
).
2.
J.
Clement
, “
Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
50
,
66
71
(
Jan.
1982
).
3.
D.
Hestenes
,
M.
Wells
, and
G.
Swackhamer
, “
Force Concept Inventory
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
,
141
158
(
March
1992
).
4.
C.
Singh
, “
Problem solving and learning
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
1140
,
183
197
(
2009
).
5.
T.
Byun
and
G.
Lee
, “
Why students still can't solve physics problems after solving over 2000 problems
,”
Am. J. Phys.
82
,
906
913
(
Sept.
2014
).
6.
W.
Brouwer
, “
A process approach to problem solving in physics
,”
Phys. Teach.
11
,
483
485
(
Nov.
1973
).
7.
F.
Reif
,
J. H.
Larkin
, and
G. C.
Brackett
, “
Teaching general learning and problem-solving skills
,”
Am. J. Phys.
44
,
212
217
(
March
1976
).
8.
F.
Reif
, “
Teaching problem solving—A scientific approach
,”
Phys. Teach.
19
,
310
316
(
May
1981
).
9.
D. S.
Wright
and
C. D.
Williams
, “
A WISE strategy for introductory physics
,”
Phys. Teach.
24
,
211
216
(
April
1986
).
10.
J.
Larkin
,
J.
McDermott
,
D. P.
Simon
, and
H. A.
Simon
, “
Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems
,”
Sci.
208
(
4450
),
1335
1343
(
June
1980
).
11.
M. T. H.
Chi
,
P. J.
Feltovich
, and
R.
Glaser
, “
Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices
,”
Cog. Sci.
5
,
121
152
(
1981
).
12.
P. T.
Hardiman
,
R.
Dufresne
, and
J. P.
Mestre
, “
The relation between problem categorization and problem solving among experts and novices
,”
Mem. Cognition
17
(
5
),
627
638
(
1989
).
13.
K.
Schultz
and
J.
Lockhead
, “
A View from Physics
,” in
Toward a Unified Theory of Problem Solving: Views From the Content Domains
, edited by
M. U.
Smith
(
Erlbaum
,
Hillsdale, NJ
,
1991
), pp.
99
114
.
14.
A.
Van Heuvelen
, “
Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies
,”
Am. J. Phys.
59
,
891
897
(
Oct.
1991
).
15.
K. A.
Harper
, “
Student problem-solving behaviors
,”
Phys. Teach.
44
,
250
251
(
April
2006
).
16.
G.
Pólya
,
How to Solve It
(
Princeton University Press
,
1945
).
17.
T.
Passermore
, “
Pólya's legacy: Fully forgotten or getting a new perspective in theory and practice?
Aust. Sen. Math. J.
21
(
2
),
44
53
(
July
2007
).
18.
R.
Beichner
,
D.
Deardorff
, and
B.
Zhang
, “
GOAL-oriented problem solving
,” NCSU.edu (
June
2002
), ftp://ftp.ncsu.edu/pub/ncsu/beichner/RB/GOALPaper.pdf.
19.
E.
Lederman
, “
Journey into problem solving: A gift from Pólya
,”
Phys. Teach.
47
,
94
97
(
Feb.
2009
).
20.
See [supplementary material] available under the “References” tab at TPT Online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4947158.
21.
R. M.
Felder
and
L. K.
Silverman
, “
Learning and teaching styles in engineering education
,”
Eng. Educ.
78
(
7
),
674
681
(
1988
with 2002 author's preface); http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/LS-1988.pdf.
22.
D.
Kolb
,
Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development
, 2nd ed. (
Pearson FT Press
,
2014
).
23.
J. H.
Larkin
and
H. A.
Simon
, “
Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth 10,000 Words
,” in
Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives
, edited by
J.
Glasgow
,
N.
Hari Narayanan
, and
B.
Chandrasekaran
(
AAAI Press/MIT press
,
1995
).
24.
The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology
, edited by
T. F.
Hoad
(
Oxford University Press
,
New York
,
1996
).
25.
K. A.
Harper
, “
Grading without losing all your time (and your mind!)
,”
Phys. Teach.
40
,
584
585
(
Dec.
2011
).

Supplementary Material

AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.