Generally, cohorts or learning communities enrich higher learning in students. Learning communities consist of conventionally separate groups of students that meet together with common academic purposes and goals. Types of learning communities include paired courses with concurrent student enrollment, living-learning communities, and faculty learning communities. This article discusses a learning community of 21 students that I created with a colleague in the English department. The community encompasses two general education courses: an algebra-based physics course entitled “Intro to Physics” and a literature course entitled “Science Fiction, Science Fact.” Students must enroll in both of these courses during the same semester. Additionally, I highlight advantages to linking these courses through surveying the assignments and course materials that we used in our learning community. Figure 1 shows the topics that are covered in both physics and literature courses.
References
1.
Kimberlee
Daus
and Rachel
Rigsby
, “Chapter 8: The Power of Experiential Learning: Leveraging your General Education Curriculum to Invigorate your Chemistry Courses
,” in The Promise of Chemical Education: Addressing our Students' Needs
, ACS Symposium, Series 1193 (American Chemical Society
, 2015
).2.
Chun-Mei
Zhao
and George D.
Kuh
, “Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement
,” Res. High. Educ.
45
(2
), 115
–138
(2004
). 3.
Kima
Cargill
and Beth
Kalikoff
, “Linked psychology and writing courses across the curriculum
,” J. Gen. Educ.
56
(2
), 83
–92
(2007
). 4.
Gregory
Benford
, John
Woodcock
, Samuel
Delany
, Robert
Scholes
, and Alan J.
Friedman
, “Teaching science fiction: Unique challenges
,” Sci. Fict. Stud.
6
(3
), 249
–262
(1979
).5.
Warren B.
Westcott
and J. Everett
Spell
, “Tearing down the wall: Literature and science
,” Engl. J.
89
(2
), 70
–76
(1999
). 6.
Michaela
Galles
and Paul J.
Olson
, “A new method of linking courses: A theologian and a sociologist share their experiences
,” Innov. High. Educ.
33
, 39
–48
(2008
). 7.
Jacob Clark
Blickenstaff
, “I'll bring the popcorn! Using popular movies in science class
,” Sci. Teach.
78
, 42
–46
(2011
).8.
Gary
Westfahl
, “‘The closely reasoned technological story’: The critical history of hard science fiction
,” Sci. Fict. Stud.
20
(2
), 157
–175
(1993
).9.
Susan
Stone-Blackburn
, “Science and humanism in Gregory Benford's Timescape
,” Sci. Fict. Stud.
15
(3
), 295
–311
(1988
).10.
David N.
Samuelson
, “Modes of extrapolation: The formulas of hard SF
,” Sci. Fict. Stud.
20
(2
), 191
–232
(1993
).11.
Guy J.
Consolmagno
, “Astronomy, science fiction and popular culture: 1277 to 2001 (and beyond)
,” Leonardo
29
(2
), 127
–132
(1996
). 12.
Vandana
Singh
, “More than ‘cool science’: Science fiction and fact in the classroom
,” Phys. Teach.
52
, 106
–108
(Feb.
2014
). 13.
Volkan Damli
Hasan
, Shanin
Kizilcik
, and Yasin
Unsal
, “Physics in movies: Awareness levels of teacher candidates
,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ.
10
(6
), 681
–690
(2014
).14.
Marta L.
Dark
, “Using science fiction movies in introductory physics
,” Phys. Teach.
43
, 463
–465
(Oct.
2005
). 15.
Donald A.
Smith
, “Reaching nonscience students through science fiction
,” Phys. Teach.
47
, 302
–305
(May
2009
). 16.
Costas J.
Efthimiou
and Ralph A.
Llewellyn
, “Avatars of Hollywood in physical science
,” Phys. Teach.
44
, 28
(Jan.
2006
). 17.
David A.
Kirby
, “Science consultants, fictional films, and scientific practice
,” Soc. Stud. Sci.
33
(2
), 231
–268
(2003
). 18.
“
Metropolis
” (Paramount Pictures
, Hollywood, CA
, 1927
).19.
Murray A.
Sperber
, “Review by: Murray A. Sperber,” “The Science Fiction of H. G. Wells by Frank McConnell; H.G. Wells: Discoverer of the Future: The Influence of Science on His Thought by R. D. Haynes
,” Victorian Stud.
25
(3
), 384
–386
(1982
).20.
George
Slusser
and Daniele
Chatelain
, “Spacetime geometries: Time travel and the modern geometrical narrative
,” Sci. Fict. Stud.
22
(2
), 161
–186
(1995
).21.
Murray
Hausknecht
, “H. G. Wells: A modern primitive
,” Am. J. Econ. Sociol.
9
(2
), 205
–216
(1950
). 22.
23.
24.
“
Interstellar
” (Paramount Pictures
, Hollywood, CA
, 2014
).25.
George
Slusser
and Daniele
Chatelain
, “Conveying unknown worlds: Patterns of communication in science fiction
,” Sci. Fict. Stud.
29
(2
), 161
–185
(2002
).26.
“
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home
” (Paramount Pictures
, Hollywood, CA
, 1986
).27.
Timothy
Unwin
, “Jules Verne: Negotiating change in the nineteenth century
,” Sci. Fict. Stud.
32
(1
), 5
–17
(2005
).28.
Jules
Verne
, Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea
(Pierre-Jules Hetzel
, France
, 1870
).29.
“
Gravity
” (Warner Bros.
, Burbank, CA
, 2013
).30.
31.
“
Armageddon
” (Buena Vista Pictures
, Burbank, CA
, 1998
). 32.
33.
“
2001: A Space Odyssey
” (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
, Beverly Hills, CA
, 1968
).34.
35.
36.
“
Contact
” (Warner Bros.
, Burbank, CA
, 1997
).© 2016 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2016
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
