Some misconceptions about physics are hard to change. For example, students continue to believe that heavier objects fall faster than light ones, even after a year of physics instruction. Physics misconceptions are persistent. Light objects do fall more slowly if their size-to-weight ratio is sufficient for drag to be appreciable. Motion through a viscous medium is an advanced topic and students are asked to hold their curiosity until they take a more advanced course. Most never will. We suggest that the idea that heavier objects fall faster (or lighter objects fall slower) is a reasonable approximation that people develop from observing the world around them. We also suggest that discussing drag qualitatively at the outset may allow students to reconcile what they learn in physics class with a concept formed in early childhood. This approach asks students to modify their concept rather than discard it. In this paper we present a simple physics lab experiment that can be performed with readily available equipment and which bridges the gap between the domains of constant velocity and constant acceleration free fall. It is motivated by a lab experiment described in Paul Robinson's laboratory manual.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2016
PAPERS|
April 01 2016
Bridging the Conceptual Gap Between Free Fall and Drag-Dominated Regimes
Elida de Obaldia;
Elida de Obaldia
1
Universidad Tecnologica de Panama
, Panamá, Panama
Search for other works by this author on:
Norma Miller;
Norma Miller
1
Universidad Tecnologica de Panama
, Panamá, Panama
Search for other works by this author on:
George Jaimison;
George Jaimison
2
Richland College
, Dallas, TX
Search for other works by this author on:
Kendra Wallis
Kendra Wallis
3
Eastfield College
, Mesquite, TX
Search for other works by this author on:
Phys. Teach. 54, 233–235 (2016)
Citation
Elida de Obaldia, Norma Miller, Fred Wittel, George Jaimison, Kendra Wallis; Bridging the Conceptual Gap Between Free Fall and Drag-Dominated Regimes. Phys. Teach. 1 April 2016; 54 (4): 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4944365
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
349
Views
Citing articles via
Related Content
On the rise and fall of a ball with linear or quadratic drag
American Journal of Physics (June 1999)
High-altitude free fall revised
Am. J. Phys. (June 2010)
Measuring the Drag Force on a Falling Ball
Phys. Teach. (March 2014)
Accurate measurement of the position and velocity of a falling object
Am. J. Phys. (March 2007)
Mathematical vs. conceptual understanding: Where do we draw the line?
AIP Conference Proceedings (January 2013)