Some misconceptions about physics are hard to change. For example, students continue to believe that heavier objects fall faster than light ones, even after a year of physics instruction. Physics misconceptions are persistent. Light objects do fall more slowly if their size-to-weight ratio is sufficient for drag to be appreciable. Motion through a viscous medium is an advanced topic and students are asked to hold their curiosity until they take a more advanced course. Most never will. We suggest that the idea that heavier objects fall faster (or lighter objects fall slower) is a reasonable approximation that people develop from observing the world around them. We also suggest that discussing drag qualitatively at the outset may allow students to reconcile what they learn in physics class with a concept formed in early childhood. This approach asks students to modify their concept rather than discard it. In this paper we present a simple physics lab experiment that can be performed with readily available equipment and which bridges the gap between the domains of constant velocity and constant acceleration free fall. It is motivated by a lab experiment described in Paul Robinson's laboratory manual.

1.
Ibrahim Abou
Hallouna
and
David
Hestenes
, “
The initial knowledge state of college physics students
,”
Am. J. Phys.
53
(
11
),
1043
1048
(
Nov.
1985
).
2.
W.
Wessel
, “
Knowledge Construction in High School Physics: A Study of Student Teacher Interaction
,” SSTA Research Centre Report #99-04 (1999).
3.
L.
Halim
,
T. K.
Yong
, and
T. S. M.
Meerah
, “
Overcoming students' misconceptions on forces in equilibrium: An action research study
,”
Creative Educ.
5
,
1032
1042
(
2014
).
4.
Examples of advance physics classes: Fluid Dynamics, Classical Mechanics.
5.
Paul
Robinson
,
Laboratory Manual Conceptual Physics
, 11th ed. (
Addison-Wesley
,
2010
).
6.
John
Cunningham
and
Robert
Karplus
, “
Free fall demonstration experiment
,”
Am. J. Phys.
30
,
656
(
Sept.
1962
).
7.
Also firsthand experience with first year community college students dropping full and empty 2-liter soda bottles.
8.
Stuart M.
Quick
, “
A computer assisted freefall experiment for the freshman laboratory
,”
Am. J. Phys.
57
,
814
(
Sept.
1989
).
9.
Vasilis
Pagonis
,
David
Guerra
,
Sean
Chauduri
,
Brian
Hornbecker
, and
Nathan
Smith
, “
Effect of air resistance
,”
Phys. Teach.
35
,
364
(
Sept.
1997
).
10.
Richard A.
Young
, “
Improving the data analysis for falling coffee filters
,”
Phys. Teach.
39
,
398
(
Oct.
2001
).
11.
Patrik
Vogt
and
Jochen
Kuhn
, “
Analyzing free fall with a smartphone acceleration sensor
,”
Phys. Teach.
50
,
182
(
March
2012
).
12.
Standard physics labs have students determine g and then determine the error in their measurements. This procedure does not help students understand realistic behavior of drag-dominated falling objects.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.