The importance of understanding and internalizing the scientific method can hardly be exaggerated. Unfortunately, it is all too common for high school—and even university—students to graduate with only a partial or oversimplified understanding of what the scientific method is and how to actually employ it. Help in remedying this situation may come from an unlikely source: television. One television show that is conspicuously good at communicating the scientific method in an easy-to-understand, pedantic-free, entertaining manner is the Discovery Channel's “MythBusters,” which began airing in 2003 and continues to produce new episodes. In this content analysis, episodes of the popular program were analyzed for aspects of the scientific method. In addition, segments from the show were used in a classroom activity to introduce the scientific method and the concept of experimental controls to high school physics students.

Topics
Bioacoustics of insects, Fuels, Internet, Television broadcasting, Educational aids, Educational assessment, Insects, Amino acid, Neuroanatomy, Funding
1.
J.
 
Schwartz
, “
The Best Science Show on Television?
”
The New York Times
(
Nov.
 
21
,
2006
), http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/21/science/21myth.html.
Google Scholar
 
2.
L.
 
Webster
, “
The Mythbusters' guide to gonzo engineering
,”
Pop. Mech.
 
186
,
48
–
57
(
Sept.
 
2009
).
Google Scholar
 
3.
R.
 
Mehta
, “
Classy Classes: THINK 1 teaches students how to fail for science
,”
The Stanford Daily
(
Nov.
 
17
,
2014
), http://www.stanforddaily.com/2014/11/17/classy-classes-think1-teaches-students-how-to-fail-for-science/.
Google Scholar
 
4.
B.
 
Carey
, “
At Stanford, ‘The Science of MythBusters’ teaches the scientific method
,”
Stanford Report
(
Nov.
 
19
,
2012
), http://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/november/science-myth-busters-111912.html.
Google Scholar
 
5.
M.
 
Bassey
,
Science and Society: The Meaning and Importance of Scientific Method
(
University of London Press
,
London
,
1968
).
Google Scholar
 
6.
National Research Council (NRC)
,
America's Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science
(
National Academies Press
,
Washington, DC
,
2005
).
7.
See [supplementary material] available under the “References” tab at TPT Online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4944364 .
8.
L.
 
Harsing
,
Scientific Reasoning and Epistemic Attitudes
(
Akademiai Kiado
,
Budapest
,
1982
).
Google Scholar
 
9.
A.
 
Bueno
 and
R.
 
Ellis
,
The Craft of Thinking: Logic, Scientific Method, and the Pursuit of Truth
(
Clark Atlanta University Press
,
Atlanta
,
1999
).
Google Scholar
 
10.
National Research Council (NRC)
,
National Science Education Standards
(
National Academies Press
,
Washington, DC
,
1996
).
11.
J.
 
Pedicino
, “
Teaching critical thinking in an age of political disinformation and perceived anti-intellectualism: Helping to build a responsible citizen in a community-college setting
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
 
37
(
3
),
10
(
Jan./Feb.
 
2008
).
Google Scholar
 
12.
J.
 
Williams
, “
The scientific method and school science
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
 
38
(
1
),
14
–
16
(
Sept./Oct.
 
2008
).
Google Scholar
 
13.
J.
 
McLaughlin
, “
A gentle reminder that a hypothesis is never proven correct, nor is a theory ever proven to be true
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
 
36
(
1
),
60
–
62
(
Sept.
 
2006
).
Google Scholar
 
14.
K.
 
Popper
,
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
(
Harper & Row
,
New York
,
1959
).
Google Scholar
 
15.
R.
 
Preston
,
The Demon in the Freezer
(
Ballantine Publishing Group
,
New York
,
2002
).
Google Scholar
 
16.
National Research Council (NRC)
,
A Framework for K-12 Science Education Standards
(
National Academies Press
,
Washington, DC
,
2012
).
17.
D.
 
Dykstra
, “
What should elementary science education be about?
”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
 
34
(
7
),
7
–
8
(
Jul./Aug.
 
2005
).
Google Scholar
 
18.
F.
 
Firooznia
, “
Giant ants and walking plants: Using science fiction to teach a writing-intensive, lab-based biology class for nonmajors
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
 
35
(
5
),
26
–
31
(
Mar./April
 
2006
).
Google Scholar
 
19.
J.
 
Hohman
,
P.
 
Adams
,
G.
 
Taggart
,
J.
 
Heinrichs
, and
K.
 
Hickman
, “
A ‘nature of science’ discussion: Connecting mathematics and science
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
 
36
(
1
),
18
–
21
(
Sept.
 
2006
).
Google Scholar
 
20.
I.
 
Shibley
,
M.
 
Dunbar
,
T.
 
Mysliwiec
, and
D.
 
Dunbar
, “
Using science popularizations to promote learner-centered teaching alternatives to the traditional textbook
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
 
38
(
2
),
54
–
58
(
Nov./Dec.
 
2008
).
Google Scholar
 
© 2016 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2016
American Association of Physics Teachers

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material- zip file
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.