The January 2016 “Figuring Physics” column1 compares the weight of two beakers containing the same amount of water, with a Ping-Pong ball tethered to the bottom of the left one and a lead ball held submerged in the right one by a string tied to an external support. The solution2 can be used to show that the weight of the right beaker would be the same as that of a beaker filled to the same depth of water having no ball in it. Consequently that would also be the weight of the left beaker if, rather than being tethered to the bottom, the Ping-Pong ball were tethered to an externally supported arm that dips into the water below the ball as in Fig. 1. (A simple way to understand this fact is that in all three illustrated cases the scale reads the weight of the glass plus...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2016
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR|
March 01 2016
Buoyant beaker balls
Carl Mungan
Carl Mungan
U.S. Naval Academy Annapolis, MD
Search for other works by this author on:
Phys. Teach. 54, 132 (2016)
Citation
Carl Mungan; Buoyant beaker balls. Phys. Teach. 1 March 2016; 54 (3): 132. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4942126
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Explaining Quanta with Optical Illusions
Gianluca Li Causi
Sauntering Sauropods: The Preferred Walking Speeds of the Largest Land Animals That Ever Lived
Scott A. Lee, Justyna Slowiak
Where Is Half of the Universe?
Don Lincoln
Related Content
Buoyant beaker balls: Another view
The Physics Teacher (November 2016)
Ping-pong ball cannon: Why do barrel and balls fly in the same direction?
Am. J. Phys. (April 2019)
The physics of juggling a spinning ping-pong ball
Am. J. Phys. (December 2016)
Impact behavior of hollow balls
Am. J. Phys. (March 2014)
Two Beakers, Five E’s, Twenty Pennies, and Archimedes’ Principle
Phys. Teach. (March 2019)