A teacher learning how to write test questions (test items) will almost certainly encounter item-writing guidelines—lists of item-writing do's and don'ts. Item-writing guidelines usually are presented as applicable across all assessment settings. Table I shows some guidelines that I believe to be generally applicable and two will be briefly discussed here. The teacher may also encounter some guidelines that are not applicable in all assessment settings, or that can be applied to physics only with care. Two such guidelines, and their limitations, will be discussed as well.

1.
Gordon J.
Aubrecht
, II
and
Judith D.
Aubrecht
, “
Constructing objective tests
,”
Am. J. Phys.
51
(
7
),
613
620
(
July
1983
).
2.
William A.
Rieck
, “
Putting assessment to the test: Tips for designing standards-based tests
,”
Sci. Teach.
69
,
46
49
(
Feb.
2002
).
3.
Melanie
Taylor
and
Sean
Smith
, “
How do you know if they're getting it? Writing assessment items that reveal student understanding
,”
Sci. Scope
32
,
60
64
(
Jan.
2009
).
4.
Alan
Colburn
, “
Multiple-choice season
,”
Sci. Teach.
70
,
10
(
Sept.
2003
).
5.
T.
Haladyna
,
S.
Downing
, and
M.
Rodriguez
, “
A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment
,”
Appl. Meas. Educ.
15
(
3
),
309
333
(
2002
).
6.
Ref. 3.
7.
The use of distractors as a probe of misconceptions is not considered here.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.