This article describes the 25-year history of development of the activity-based Workshop Physics (WP) at Dickinson College, its adaptation for use at Gettysburg Area High School, and its synergistic influence on curricular materials developed at the University of Oregon and Tufts University and vice versa. WP and these related curricula: 1) are based on Physics Education Research (PER) findings and are PER-validated; 2) feature active, collaborative learning; and 3) use computer-based tools that enable students to learn by making predictions and then collecting, displaying, and analyzing data from their experiments.
References
2.
Jan
Mokros
and Robert
Tinker
, “The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
24
, 369
–383
(April
1987
). 3.
P. W.
Laws
, “Calculus-based physics without lectures
,” Phys. Today
44
, 24
–31
(Dec.
1991
). 4.
P. W.
Laws
, “A unit on oscillations, determinism and chaos for introductory physics students
,” Am. J. Phys.
72
, 446
(April
2004
). 5.
D. P.
Jackson
and P. W.
Laws
, “Syringe thermodynamics: The many uses of a glass syringe
,” Am. J. Phys.
74
, 94
(Feb.
2006
). 6.
P. W.
Laws
, “Millikan Lecture 1996: Promoting active learning based on Physics Education Research in introductory physics courses
,” Am. J. Phys.
65
, 14
(Jan.
1997
). 7.
P. W.
Laws
, The Workshop Physics Activity Guide
, Module 4, Unit 19 Section 19.6, pp. 537
–542
.8.
D. R.
Sokoloff
, P. W.
Laws
, and R. K.
Thornton
, RealTime Physics Active Learning Laboratories
, Module 3 Electricity & Magnetism, Lab 3, Investigation 2.9.
P. W.
Laws
, R. B.
Teese
, M. C.
Willis
, and P. J.
Cooney
, Physics with Video Analysis
(Vernier
, Portland, OR
, 2009
).11.
M. S.
Steinberg
and C. L.
Wainwright
, “Using models to teach electricity – The CASTLE Project
,” Phys. Teach.
31
, 340
(Sept.
1993
). 12.
L. C.
McDermott
and P. S.
Shaffer
, “Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
, 994
(Nov.
1992
). 13.
L. C.
McDermott
and P. S.
Shaffer
, “Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part II: Design of an instructional strategy
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
, 1003
–1013
(Nov.
1992
). 15.
H.
Pfister
and P.
Laws
, “Kinesthesia-1: Apparatus to experience 1-D motion
,” Phys. Teach.
33
, 214
(April
1995
). 16.
Currently VideoPoint™ is distributed for Windows only by Lennox Softworks at http://videopoint.software.informer.com/2.1/.
17.
P.
Laws
and H.
Pfister
, “Using digital video analysis in introductory mechanics projects
,” Phys. Teach.
36
, 282
(May
1998
);R.
Doherty
, J.
Rembert
, N.
Boice
and P.
Laws
, “Star Wars and gravitational constants
,” Phys. Teach.
36
, 270
(May
1998
). 18.
20.
Based on current information provided by the John Wiley & Sons Physics Editor.
21.
Ibid.
22.
David R.
Sokoloff
and Ronald K.
Thornton
, Interactive Lecture Demonstrations
(Wiley
, 2004
).23.
David R.
Sokoloff
and Ronald K.
Thornton
, “Using Interactive Lecture Demonstrations to create an active learning environment
,” Phys. Teach.
35
, 340
(Sept.
1997
). 24.
David R.
Sokoloff
, Ronald K.
Thornton
, and Priscilla
Laws
, “RealTime Physics: Active learning labs transforming the introductory laboratory
,” Eur. J. Phys.
28
, S83
–S94
(2007
). 25.
David R.
Sokoloff
, Priscilla
Laws
, and Ronald K.
Thornton
, RealTime Physics
, 3rd ed. (Wiley
, 2011
), Module 1: Mechanics, Module 2: Heat and Thermodynamics, Module 3: Electricity and Magnetism, and Module 4: Light and Optics.26.
Ronald K.
Thornton
and David R.
Sokoloff
, “Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula
,” Am. J. Phys.
66
, 338
(April
1998
). 27.
David R.
Sokoloff
, “Teaching Electric Circuit Concepts Using Microcomputer-Based Current and Voltage Probes
,” in Microcomputer-Based Labs: Educational Research and Standards
, edited by Robert F.
Tinker
, Series F, Computer and Systems Sciences (Springer Verlag
, 1996
), pp. 129
–146
, 156.28.
D.
Hestenes
, M.
Wells
, and G.
Swackhamer
, “Force Concept Inventory
,” Phys. Teach.
30
, 141
(March
1992
). 29.
30.
AAPT PhysPort Website, http://www.physport.org/assessments/.
31.
When the g factor for a class is calculated using the difference between the class averages on the post-test and pre-test, respectively, rather than the average of each class member's gain, it is sometimes referred to as “normalized change” and notated as <g>.
J.D.
Marx
and K.
Cumming
, “Normalized change
,” Am. J. Phys.
75
, 87
(Jan.
2007
). 32.
33.
J. M.
Saul
, “Beyond problem solving: Evaluating introductory physics courses through the hidden curriculum
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland
, 1998
.34.
Unpublished data from the Dickinson College Department of Physics and Astronomy.
35.
Ref. 23.
36.
Ref. 24.
37.
Ref. 26.
38.
39.
Private communication with Juliet Brosing at Pacific University, http://www.pacificu.edu/about-us/faculty/juliet-brosing-phd.
40.
Private communication with Pat Keefe at Clatsop Community College, Astoria, OR, http://grantome.com/grant/NSF/DUE-9351589.
41.
K.
Cummings
, J.
Marx
, R.
Thornton
, and D.
Kuhl
, “Evaluating innovation in studio physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
, S38
–S44
(1999
). 43.
44.
National Microcomputer-Based Laboratory Institute for High School Physics Teachers, sponsored by the Secretary's Discretionary Fund of the U.S. Department of Education (Summers 1987–1988).
45.
The Activity Based Physics High School E-dition
, is available at http://www.vernier.com/products/books/abp-e/.46.
For current workshop offerings, see http://pages.uoregon.edu/sokoloff/physcourse.htm.
47.
Ibid.
© 2015 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2015
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.