Anyone who has taught introductory physics should know that roughly a third of the students initially believe that any object at rest will remain at rest, whereas any moving body not propelled by applied forces will promptly come to rest. Likewise, about half of those uninitiated students believe that any object moving at a constant speed must be continually pushed if it is to maintain its motion.1 That's essentially Aristotle's law of motion and it is so “obviously” borne out by experience that it was accepted by scholars for 2000 years, right through the Copernican Revolution. But, of course, it's fundamentally wrong. This paper tells the story of how the correct understanding, the law of inertia, evolved and how Newton came to make it his first law.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 2015
PAPERS|
February 01 2015
Origins of Newton's First Law
Eugene Hecht
Eugene Hecht
Adelphi University
, Garden City, NY
Search for other works by this author on:
Phys. Teach. 53, 80–83 (2015)
Citation
Eugene Hecht; Origins of Newton's First Law. Phys. Teach. 1 February 2015; 53 (2): 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4905802
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Explaining Quanta with Optical Illusions
Gianluca Li Causi
Sauntering Sauropods: The Preferred Walking Speeds of the Largest Land Animals That Ever Lived
Scott A. Lee, Justyna Slowiak
Secondary and University Students’ Descriptions of Quantum Superposition
Nicoline Berit Campbell Birkeland, Maria Vetleseter Bøe
Related Content
The Copernican myths
Physics Today (December 2007)
The great Copernican cliché
American Journal of Physics (October 2001)
Kepler and the origins of pre-Newtonian mass
American Journal of Physics (February 2017)
Kepler and the origins of the theory of gravity
American Journal of Physics (March 2019)
Do physicists need myths?
American Journal of Physics (May 2006)