Anyone who has taught introductory physics should know that roughly a third of the students initially believe that any object at rest will remain at rest, whereas any moving body not propelled by applied forces will promptly come to rest. Likewise, about half of those uninitiated students believe that any object moving at a constant speed must be continually pushed if it is to maintain its motion.1 That's essentially Aristotle's law of motion and it is so “obviously” borne out by experience that it was accepted by scholars for 2000 years, right through the Copernican Revolution. But, of course, it's fundamentally wrong. This paper tells the story of how the correct understanding, the law of inertia, evolved and how Newton came to make it his first law.

1.
Ibrahim A.
Halloun
and
David
Hestenes
, “
Common sense concepts about motion
,”
Am. J. Phys.
53
,
1056
1065
(
Nov. 1985
).
2.
Eugene
Hecht
,
Physics in Perspective
(
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, MA
,
1980
), pp.
31
92
.
3.
H. J. J.
Winter
, “
The Arabic Achievement in Physics
,” in
Toward Modern Science, Vol. 1
, edited by Robert M. Palter (
The Noonday Press
,
New York
,
1961
), p.
171
.
4.
Ref. 3,
Ernest A.
Moody
, “
Laws of motion in medieval physics
,” p.
220
.
5.
To prove the absurdity of vacuum, Aristotle argued: “[W]hy should it [i.e., a body set in motion in vacuum] stop in one place rather than in another? So either it will be resting or it will of necessity be travelling without end, unless obstructed by something more powerful.” Physics, translated by Hippocrates Apostle (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1969), p. 73.
6.
Johannes
Kepler
,
Somnium
, translated by Edward Rosen (
University of Wisconsin
,
Madison
,
1967
), p.
73
.
7.
Galileo
Galilei
,
Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences
, translated by Henry Crew and Alfonso deSalvio (
Dover Publications
,
New York
,
1954
), pp.
170
and 215. The first word in the title (discorsi) is nowadays translated “discourses.”
8.
Ref. 7, p.
244
.
9.
Galileo
Galilei
,
Dialogues Concerning the Two Chief World Systems—Ptolemaic and Copernican
, translated by Stillman Drake, (
University of California Press
,
Berkeley
,
1967
), p.
19
.
10.
Ref. 7, p.
215
.
11.
Stillman
Drake
,
Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo
(
Double-day Anchor
,
Garden City, NY
,
1957
), p.
113
.
12.
Alexandre
Koyré
,
Newtonian Studies
(
Harvard University Press
,
Cambridge, MA
,
1965
), p.
73
.
13.
Ref. 12, p.
73
.
14.
Ref. 9, pp.
186
188
.
15.
Max
Jammer
,
Concepts of Force
(
Harvard University Press
,
Cambridge, MA
,
1957
), p.
119
.
16.
Isaac
Newton
,
The Principia
, translated by I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman (
University of California Press
,
Berkeley, CA
,
1999
), p.
100
.
17.
Ref. 16, p.
404
.
18.
Ref. 16, p.
411
.
19.
James Clerk
Maxwell
,
Matter and Motion
(
Dover Publications
,
New York
,
1991
), p.
48
.
20.
Eugene
Hecht
, “
From the postulates of relativity to the law of inertia
,”
Phys. Teach.
38
,
497
(
Nov. 2000
).
21.
Ref. 12, p.
73
.
22.
Galileo had a similar understanding of how to add the two component velocities of a projectile.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.