It has been the author's experience over many years, no doubt shared by others, that a stick of chalk usually breaks into three pieces when accidentally dropped onto the floor. I rarely gave it any thought, apart from noting that the fundamental mode of vibration of a freely supported, rigid rod has two nodes at an equal distance from each end. For example, a baseball bat has a node in the barrel (the sweet spot) about 15 cm from the end and another node in the handle. However, chalk is not expected to break at the node points, since maximum stress arises at the antinode in the middle of the chalk where bending is a maximum. Richard Feynman described a similar problem with long sticks of spaghetti.1 He found that they always break into three or more pieces when bent slowly beyond their breaking point, rather than simply breaking in half. He was unable to figure out why, although the problem was solved many years later2 and is nicely illustrated by Vollmer and Mollmann.3

1.
D. W.
Hillis
,
No Ordinary Genius
, edited by Ed.
C.
Sykes
, (
Norton
,
NY
,
1994
).
2.
B.
Audoly
and
S.
Neukirch
, “
Fragmentation of rods by cascading cracks: Why spaghetti does not break in half
,”
Phys. Rev. Letts.
95
(
9
),
095505
(
2005
).
3.
M.
Vollmer
and
K-P
Mollmann
, “
Exploding balloons, deformed balls, strange reflections and breaking rods: Slow motion analysis of selected hands-on experiments
,”
Phys. Educ.
46
(
4
),
472
485
(
2011
).
4.
G.
Vandegrift
, “
Transverse bending waves and the breaking broomstick demonstration
,”
Am. J. Phys.
65
(
6
),
505
510
(
June 1997
).
5.
G.
Varieschi
and
K.
Kamiya
, “
Toy models for the falling chimney
,”
Am. J. Phys.
71
(
10
),
1025
1031
(
Oct. 2003
).
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.