Universities and even high schools are moving more and more to online instruction as a cost-effective way to reach more students with fewer resources. This naturally raises the question: Can online learning be effective? (The question is not “Is online learning effective?” because just like face-to-face instruction, online instruction includes a diverse array of techniques.) In this paper I compare online and flipped face-to-face versions of an introductory astronomy course. Both versions were designed around student-centered learning principles, but the specific implementation of these principles varied according to the strengths of each type of instruction. Normalized Hake gains on the Star Properties Concept Inventory (SPCI) were quite similar for both classes: 56% and 58% for the online and flipped face-to-face versions, respectively. The gains obtained by students with low pre-test scores were as good as the ones achieved by students with high pre-test scores.

1.
J. D.
Bransford
,
A. L.
Brown
, and
R. R.
Cocking
,
How People Learn
(
National Academy Press
,
Washington, DC
,
2000
).
2.
Andrew
Elby
, “
Helping physics students learn how to learn
,”
Am. J. Phys.
69
(
S1
),
S54
S64
(
July2001
).
3.
David B.
May
and
Eugenia
Etkina
, “
College physics students' epistemological self-reflection and its relationship to conceptual learning
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
(
12
),
1249
1258
(
Dec. 2002
).
4.
E. F.
Redish
, “
Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
62
(
9
),
796
803
(
Sept. 1994
).
5.
National Research Council
,
Adapting to a Changing World — Challenges and Opportunities in Undergraduate Physics Education
(
National Academies Press
,
Washington, DC
,
2013
).
6.
E. E.
Prather
,
A. L.
Rudolph
,
G.
Brissenden
, and
W M.
Schlingman
, “
A national study assessing the teaching and learning of introductory astronomy. Part I. The effect of interactive instruction
,”
Am. J. Phys.
77
(
4
),
320
330
(
April 2009
).
7.
Richard R.
Hake
, “
Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
(
1
),
64
74
(
Jan. 1998
).
9.
Gregor M.
Novak
,
Andrew
Gavrin
, and
Christian
Wolfgang
,
Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology
(
Prentice Hall PTR
,
1999
).
10.
Robert J.
Dufresne
and
William J.
Gerace
, “
Assessing to learn: Formative assessment in physics instruction
,”
Phys. Teach.
42
,
428
433
(
Oct. 2004
).
11.
Edward E.
Prather
,
Timothy F.
Slater
,
Jeffrey P.
Adams
,
Janelle M.
Bailey
,
Lauren V.
Jones
, and
Jack A.
Dostal
, “
Research on a lecture-tutorial approach to teaching introductory astronomy for non-science majors
,”
Astron. Educ. Rev.
3
,
122
136
(
Oct. 2004
).
12.
Frank
Lyman
, “
Think-pair-share: An expanding teaching technique
,”
MAA-CIE Cooperative News
1
(
1
),
1
2
(
1987
).
13.
J. M.
Bailey
and
T F.
Slater
, “
Resource Letter AER-1: Astronomy education research
,”
Am. J. Phys.
73
(
8
),
677
685
(
Aug. 2005
).
14.
Edward E.
Prather
,
Alexander L.
Rudolph
, and
Gina
Brissenden
, “
Teaching and learning astronomy in the 21st century
,”
Phys. Today
62
(
10
),
41
47
(
Oct. 2009
).
15.
J. O.
Bennett
,
M.
Donahue
,
N.
Schneider
, and
M.
Voit
,
The Cosmic Perspective
, 6th ed. (
Addison-Wesley
,
Boston
,
2010
).
16.
J. M.
Bailey
,
B.
Johnson
,
E. E.
Prather
, and
T. F.
Slater
, “
Development and validation of the Star Properties Concept Inventory
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
34
(
14
),
2256
2286
(
2012
).
17.
Michael C.
LoPresto
and
Steven R.
Murrell
, “
Using the Star Properties Concept Inventory to compare instruction with lecture tutorials to traditional lectures
,”
Astron. Educ. Rev.
8
(
1
),
010105
(
2009
).
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.