Humans have evolved to follow their intuition, but as any high school physics teacher knows, relying on intuition often leads students to predict outcomes that are at odds with evidence. Over the years, we have attempted to make this intuition-outcome disparity a central theme running throughout our physics classes, with limited success. Part of the problem is making a very clear and direct link between intuition and evidence. Typically, we ask students to make predictions before they make measurements, but often the predictions are little more than non-intuitive guesses. What we needed was an investigation where students actually do have an intuitive prediction based on their life experience. This year, we think we have finally found a way to drive home the intuition-outcome disparity through an investigation into the factors that affect frictional force.

1.
David Van
Domelen
,
“Showing area matters: A work of friction,”
Phys. Teach.
48
,
28
(
Jan. 2010
).
5.
John E.
Gastineau
,
Kenneth
Appel
,
Clarence Bakken, Richard Sorensen, and David Vernier, Physics with Vernier: Physics Experiments Using Vernier Sensors
(
Vernier Software & Technology
,
Beaverton
,
2007
).
6.
Leo
Takahashi
,
“A friction experiment”
Phys. Teach.
40
,
374
(
2002
).
9.
Logger Pro software
, Vernier, Inc., http://www.vernier.com/products/software/lp/.
10.
Diandra L.
Pelecky
,
The Physics of NASCAR: the science behind the speed
(
Plume
,
New York
,
2009
).
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.