Numerical computation (the use of a computer to solve, simulate, or visualize a physical problem) has fundamentally changed the way scientific research is done. Systems that are too difficult to solve in closed form are probed using computation. Experiments that are impossible to perform in the laboratory are studied numerically. Consequently, in modern science and engineering, computation is widely considered to be as important as theory and experiment.
REFERENCES
1.
H.
Quinn
, H.
Schweingruber
, and T.
Keller
, editors for the Committee on Conceptual Framework for the New K-12 Science Education Standards, National Research Council, A Frameworkfor K-12 Science Education: Practices
, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas
(The National Academies Press
, 2012
).2.
E.
Brewe
, “Modeling theory applied: Modeling Instruction in introductory physics,”
Am. J. Phys.
76,
1155
(2008
).3.
D. Scherer, P. Dubois, and B. A. Sherwood,
“VPython: 3D interactive scientific graphics for students,”
Comput. Sci. Eng.
2
, 56
(2000
).5.
J.
Jackson
, L.
Dukerich
, and D.
Hestenes
, “Modeling Instruction: An effective model for science education,”
Sci. Educ.
17
, 10
(2008
).6.
D.
Hestenes
, “Toward a theory of modeling instruction,”
Am. J. Phys.
55
,440
(1987
).7.
D.
Hestenes
, M.
Wells
, and G.
Swackhamer
, “A modeling method for high school instruction,”
Am. J. Phys.
63
,606
(1995
).8.
E.
Brewe
, V.
Sawtelle
, L. H.
Kramer
, G. E.
O'Brien
, I.
Rodriguez
, and P.
Pamelá
, “Toward equity through participation in Modeling Instruction in introductory university physics,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res
6
,010106
(2010
).9.
E.
Brewe
, L.
Kramer
, and G.
O'Brien
, “Modeling Instruction: Positive attitudinal shifts in introductory physics measured with CLASS,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
5
,013102
(2009
).10.
V.
Sawtelle
, E.
Brewe
, and L. H.
Kramer
, “Positive impacts of Modeling Instruction on self-efficacy,”
in Physics Education Research Conference 2010, Volume 1289 of AIP Conference Proceedings
, Portland, OR
, July 21–22,2010, pp. 289
–292
.11.
A.
Cromer
, “Stable solutions using Euler approximations,”
Am. J.Phys.
49
,455
(1981
).12.
M.
Dancy
and R.
Beichner
, “Impact of animation on assessment of conceptual understanding in physics,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
2
,010104
(2006
).14.
M. D.
Caballero
, M. A.
Kohlmyer
, and M. F.
Schatz
, “Implementing and assessing computational modeling in introductory mechanics,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
8
,020106
(2012
).15.
J. M.
Aiken
, M. D.
Caballero
, S. S.
Douglas
, J. B.
Burk
, E. M.
Scanlon
, B. D.
Thoms
, and M. F.
Schatz
, “Understanding students computational thinking with computational modeling,”
in Physics Education Research Conference 2012, Volume 1513 of AIP Conference Proceedings
, Philadelphia, PA
, Aug. 1–2, 2012
, pp. 46
–49
.© 2013 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2013
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.