often closed-ended. The outcomes are known in advance and students replicate procedures recommended by the teacher. Over the years, I have come to appreciate the great opportunities created by allowing students investigative freedom in physics laboratories. I have realized that a laboratory environment in which students are free to conduct investigations using procedures of their own design can provide them with varied and rich opportunities for discovery. This paper describes what open-ended laboratory investigations have added to my high school physics classes. I will provide several examples of open-ended laboratories and discuss the benefits they conferred on students and teacher alike.
REFERENCES
1.
Beth Ann
Thacker
, “Recent advances in classroom physics,”
Rep. Prog. Phys.
66
, 1833
–1864
(Sept. 2003
).2.
Kenneth
Tobin
, “Research on science laboratory activities, in pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning,”
School Sci. Math.
90
(5
), 403
–418
(May/June 1990
).3.
Mark
Hackling
and Patrick
Garnett
, “Primary and secondary students' attainment of science investigation skills,”
Res. Sci. Educ.
21
, 161
–170
(1991
).4.
Claudia
Haagen-Schuetzenhoefer
, “Improving the quality of lab reports by using them as lab instructions,”
Phys. Teach.
50
, 430
–433
(Oct. 2012
).5.
Helen
Staer
, Denis
Goodrum
, and Mark
Hackling
, “High school laboratory work in Western Australia: Openness to inquiry,”
Res. Sci. Educ.
28
(2
), 219
–228
(1998
).6.
Moti
Nissani
, Clifford
Maier
, and Norma
Shifrin
, “A guided discovery exercise for introductory physics labs,”
Phys. Teach.
32
, 104
–107
(Feb. 1994
).7.
Joe
Redish
, Scientific Community Labs, Physics Education Research Group, University of Maryland. Retrieved August 30, 2013
, from http://umdperg.pbworks.com/w/page/10511229/ Scientific%20Community%20Labs.8.
R. F.
Lippmann
, “Students' Understanding of Measurement and Uncertainty in the Physics Laboratory: Social Construction, Underlying Concepts, and Quantitative Analysis,” PhD dissertation (2003
). Available from http://www.physics.umd. edu/perg/dissertations/Lippmann/.9.
Eugenia
Etkina
, Sahana
Murthy
, and Xueli
Zou
, “Using introductory labs to engage students in experimental design,”
Am. J. Phys.
74
, 979
(2006
).10.
E.
Etkina
et al, “Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories,”
J. Learn. Sci.
19
(1
), 54
–98
(2010
).11.
Sandra
Duggan
and Richard
Gott
, “What sort of science education do we really need?”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
24
(7
), 661
–679
(2002
).12.
Anna
Karelina
and Eugenia
Etkina
, “Acting like a physicist: Student approach study to experimental design,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
3
(2
), 020106
(2007
).13.
Eugenia
Etkina
, Anna
Karelina
, and Maria
Ruibal-Villasenor
, “How long does it take? A study of student acquisition of scientific abilities,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res.
4
, 020108
(2008
).14.
Kelly
Deters
, “An inquiry lab on inclined planes,”
Phys. Teach.
43
(3
), 177
–179
(March 2005
).15.
Michael
Battista
, “The mathematical miseducation of America's youth: Ignoring research and scientific study in education,”
The Phi Delta Kappan
. 80
(6
), 424
–433
(Feb. 1999
).© 2013 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2013
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.