Atwood's machine is used in countless introductory physics classes as an illustration of Newton's second law. Initially, the analysis is performed assuming the pulley and string are massless and the axle is frictionless. Although the mass of the pulley is often included when the problem is revisited later in the context of rotational dynamics, the mass of the string and the friction associated with the axle are less frequently discussed. Two questions then arise: 1) If we are ignoring these effects, how realistic is our model? and 2) How can we determine when or if we need to incorporate these effects in order to make our model match up with reality? These questions are connected to fundamental issues faced by physics teachers, namely the frustration students sometimes feel when they do not see how they can use the results of the problems they have been working on and how we can help our students develop effective models for physical systems.

1.
Charles T. P.
Wang
, “
The improved determination of acceleration in Atwoods machine
,”
Am. J. Phys.
41
,
917
919
(
July 1973
).
2.
Irving L.
Kofsky
, “
Atwoods machine and the teaching of Newtons second law
,”
Am. J. Phys.
19
,
354
356
(
Sept. 1951
).
3.
Gordon O.
Johnson
, “
Making Atwoods machine ‘work,’
Phys. Teach.
39
,
154
158
(
March 2001
).
4.
Paul
Beeken
, “
Atwood's heavy chain
,”
Phys. Teach.
49
,
470
472
(
Nov. 2011
).
5.
Jay O.
Glerum
,
Stage Rigging Handbook
, 2nd ed. (
Southern Illinois University Press
,
1997
), p.
48
.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.