The purpose of Georgian Court University's “Discovery Garden” is to create an experience of the physical sciences for students, both science and non-science majors, in a place of serenity: an outdoor garden. Why a garden? Consider that the traditional laboratory experience for students is one of stark rooms ventilated with noisy hoods and endemic with lab coats and safety glasses, an alien environment that can be a source of anxiety for some students studying science, while the idea of a garden excites the imagination and conjures peace. The garden also serves as a reminder that ideas learned in the classroom apply to the everyday world. In addition, the garden is a model of informal learning, which can be especially interesting for pre-service teachers. Outlined here are some general suggestions for the design of a science garden, applicability of educational philosophy to full-body experiences, and activities suggested for students and future teachers in such a garden, as well as a mini-tour of our garden.

1.
Léonie
Rennie
Learning Science Outside of School
,” in
Handbook of Research on Science Education
, edited by
Sandra
Abell
and
Norman
Lederman
(
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
,
Mahwah, NJ
,
2007
), p.
126
.
2.
Susan
Rowe
and
Susan
Humphries
, “
The Outdoor Classroom
,” in
Learning Science Outside the Classroom
, edited by
Martin
Braud
and
Michael
Reiss
(
Taylor and Francis
,
New York
,
2004
), p.
20
.
3.
Connie
Korpan
,
Gay
Bisanz
,
Jeffery
Bisanz
,
Conrad
Boehme
, and
Mervyn
Lynch
, “
What did you learn outside of school today? Using structured interviews to document home and community activities related to science and technology
,”
Sci. Educ.
81
,
651
662
(
1997
).
4.
www.georgian.edu,
Georgian Court University's website
; search for Discovery Garden for more info.
5.
Colin
Pask
, “
Mathematics and the science of analogies
,”
Am. J. Phys.
71
,
526
534
(
June 2003
).
6.
Edward F.
Redish
and
Richard N.
Steinberg
, “
Teaching physics: Figuring out what works
,”
Phys. Today
52
,
24
30
(
Jan. 1999
).
7.
David
Hammer
, “
Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics
,”
Cognition Instruct.
12
,
151
183
(
June 1994
).
8.
Margareta
Enghag
,
Peter
Gustafsson
, and
Gunnar
Jonsson
, “
From everyday life experiences to physics understanding occurring in small group work with concept rich problems during introductory work at university
,”
Res. Sci. Educ.
37
,
449
467
(
Oct. 2007
).
9.
David H.
Jonassen
, “
Evaluating Constructivist Learning
,” in
Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction
, edited by
Thomas M.
Duffy
and
David H.
Jonassen
(
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
,
Mahwah, NJ
,
1992
), pp.
137
148
.
10.
Nir
Orion
,
Avi
Hofstein
,
Pinchas
Tamir
, and
Geoffrey
Giddings
, “
Development and validation of an instrument for assessing the learning environment of outdoor science activities
,”
Sci. Educ.
81
,
161
171
(
Aug. 1997
).
11.
Clinton
Sweet
, “
Modern architecture
,”
Archil Rec.
4
,
39
40
(
July 1894
).
12.
Mirjana
Božić
,
Dejan
Pantelić
,
Leposava
Višković
,
Slavica
Nikolić
, and
Vigor
Majić
, “
School architecture and physics education
,”
Phys. Teach.
43
,
608
611
(
Dec. 2005
).
13.
Sophia
Vackimes
, “
Exhibit Review: Science in American life, Smithsonian Institution
,”
Am. Anthropol.
98
,
388
391
(
June 1996
).
14.
Anne
Taylor
,
Robert
Aldrich
, and
George
Vlastos
, “
Architecture can teach,” IN CONTEXT: A Quarterly of Humane Sustainable Culture Transforming Education
18
,
31
32
(Winter
1988
).
15.
Michael
Crosbie
,
Architecture for Science
(
The Images Publishing Group
,
Mulgrave Victoria, Australia
,
2004
) pp.
6
13
.
16.
Anthony
Buffa
,
David
Hafemeister
, and
Ronald
Brown
, “
Physics for modern architecture
,”
Am. J. Phys.
52
,
861
(
Sept. 1984
).
17.
Joseph
Gallant
, “
The shape of the Eiffel Tower
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
,
161
162
(
Feb. 2002
).
18.
Albert
Bartlett
, “
Physics in architecture — The frozen wave
,”
Phys. Teach.
17
,
260
(
April 1979
).
19.
H. Richard
Crane
, “
How things work: A tower that seems to levitate
,”
Phys. Teach.
17
,
520
521
(
Nov. 1996
).
20.
A. E.
Tabor-Morris
,
K. A.
Froriep
,
T. M.
Briles
, and
C. M.
Mc-Guire
, “
City of physics—Analogies to increase cognitive coherence in physics learning
,”
Phys. Educ.
44
,
195
198
(
Jan. 2009
).
21.
Andrew
Fraknoi
,
The Universe at Your Fingertips
(
Project Astro, Astronomical Society of the Pacific
,
San Francisco
,
1995
), pp.
D
5
22
39
.
22.
René
Rohr
,
Sundials, History, Theory, and Practice
(
University of Toronto Press
,
Ontario, CA
,
1970
) pp.
24
, 49–52.
23.

sundials.org is the website for North American Sundial Society (NASS) Registry.

24.
Barbara
Rovsek
, “
Calibration of a horizontal sundial
,”
Phys. Teach.
48
,
397
400
(
Sept. 2010
).
25.
Sue
Allen
, “
Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain
,”
Sci. Educ.
88
,
S17
S33
(
July 2004
).
26.
Paul
Arthur
and
Romedi
Passini
,
Wayfinding, People, Signs and Architecture
(
McGraw-Hill
,
Columbus, OH
,
1992
) pp.
34
, 43.
27.
John
Falk
, “
Testing a museum exhibition design assumption: Effect of explicit labeling of exhibit clusters on visitor concept development
,”
Sci. Educ.
81
,
679
687
(
Nov. 1997
).
28.
Charles
Eik
,
Lee
Meadows
, and
Rebecca
Balkcom
, “
Breaking into inquiry, scaffolding supports beginning efforts to implement inquiry in the classroom
,”
Sci. Teach.
72
,
49
53
(
Oct. 2005
).
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.