The usual science course is not meant to be a history course and the usual science book is not meant to be a history book. However, most science books do include some historical information. Unfortunately, the history part is usually so brief that it is far from interesting and often so oversimplified that it is totally wrong. Introductory physics books often present the history of physics as a dull, cold, logical progression of discoveries and theories. As a result, the student might think that one day Sir Isaac Newton said to himself, “I think I'll produce a theory of gravitation.” Then he sat down, wrote it all out, published it, received universal acclaim, and then was included in all physics textbooks. This view of science can look pretty dull and unappealing to students.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
PAPERS|
May 01 2011
Adding a Bit More History to Science Courses
William DeBuvitz
William DeBuvitz
Mendham, NJ
Search for other works by this author on:
Phys. Teach. 49, 282–283 (2011)
Citation
William DeBuvitz; Adding a Bit More History to Science Courses. Phys. Teach. 1 May 2011; 49 (5): 282–283. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3578420
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Direct Observations and Measurements of Single Atoms
Natascha Hedrich, Ilia Sergachev, et al.
Using Math in Physics: 6. Reading the physics in a graph
Edward F. Redish
Related Content
Administratium: A 20th-Anniversary Update
The Physics Teacher (January 2009)
An error in Isaac Newton’s determination of planetary properties
American Journal of Physics (January 1991)
Of Orbits, Conics, and Grammar
The Physics Teacher (February 2005)
American Association of Physics Teachers
Physics Today (March 1960)
Isaac H. Godlove
Physics Today (October 1954)