In this paper we show that with the help of accessible, teaching‐quality equipment, some interesting and important details of the motion of a gyroscope, which are typically overlooked in introductory courses, can be measured and compared to theory. We begin by deriving a simple relation between the dip angle of a gyroscope released from rest and its precession velocity. We then describe an experiment that measures these parameters. The data are in excellent agreement with the theoretical prediction. The idea for this project was suggested by the discussion of gyroscopic motion in The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Feynman's (Fig. 1) conclusion (stated in colloquial language and quoted in the title) is confirmed and, in addition, conservation of angular momentum, which underlies this effect, is quantitatively demonstrated.

1.
R. A. Serway, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 6th ed. (Thomson/Brooks/Cole, 2009), p. 350.
2.
P. A. Tipler and G. Mosca, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 5th ed. (Freeman and Co., 2004), Vol. I, p. 316.
3.
D. C. Giancoli, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, 2000), Vol. I.
4.
R. Feynman, R. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics (CIT, 1963), Vol. I, p. 20–7.
5.
Feynman's fascination with rotational motion has become known through his autobiographical books and interviews. An interesting exploration of one of his ideas on this topic can be found in
S.
Tuleja
et al., “
Feynman's wobbling plate
,”
Am. J. Phys.
75
,
240
244
(
2007
).
6.
M. S.
Tiersten
and
H.
Soodak
, “
Propagation of a Feynman error on real and inertial forces in rotating systems
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
810
811
(
1998
).
7.
H. Crabtree, M. A., An Elementary Treatment of The Theory of Spinning Tops and Gyroscopic Motion, 2nd ed. (Longmans, Green and Co. 1914), p. 61 (available on http://books.google.com/).
8.
R.
Jakeways
, “
Towards an understanding of gyroscopic motion
,”
Phys. Educ.
3
,
79
(
1968
). This paper discusses the same effect from mostly an energy point of view.
9.
We do not know why almost no introductory textbook (Wolfson and Pasachoff's Physics, Addison‐Wesley, 1999, is an exception) mentions the dip of a gyroscope released from rest in the context of angular momentum conservation. It might be because the authors are reluctant to mix the derivation of the precession velocity (a straightforward dynamical differential relation) with a conservation principle (an integral of motion). The first may be considered more transparent and causal while the second less so. Of course, the conservation principle is extremely useful precisely when the exact equations of motion and their solutions are non‐trivial.
10.
E.
Butikov
, “
Precession and nutation of a gyroscope
,”
Eur. J. Phys.
27
,
1071
1081
(
2006
).
11.
J. R.
Prescott
, “
Demonstration gyroscope
,”
Am. J. Phys.
31
,
393
(
1963
).
12.
PASCO Gyroscope, Features and Specs; store.pasco. com/pascostore/showdetl.cfm?&DID=9&Product_ ID=1679&page=Features.
13.
J. R. Taylor, Classical Mechanics (University Science Books, 2005), p. 403.
14.
F. Y. Wang, Physics with MAPLE (Wiley‐VCH, 2006), p. 118.
15.
S. Kostov, www.compadre.org/Repository/document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=10022&DocID=1655.
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.