An operational understanding of Newton's third law is often elusive for students. Typical examples of this concept are given for contact forces that are closer to the students' everyday experience. While this is a good thing in general, the reaction force can sometimes be taken for granted, and the students can miss the opportunity to really think about what is going on. In the case of magnetic forces, however, the notion of action at a distance actually requires a careful inspection of the forces involved and thereby promotes a more detailed analysis of the situation. In this paper, a simple demonstration of Newton's third law is presented in the context of a magnet falling through a hollow conducting tube. The results are unambiguous and lead the students to an irrefutable verification of Newton's third law.

1.
R.C.
Nicklin
,
Andrew
Graham
, and
Robert
Miller
, “
Lenz's law demonstration for a large class
,”
Phys. Teach.
35
,
46
47
(Jan.
1997
).
2.
“Newton's Nightmare,” available at www.penguinmagic.com. A different version (a slotted pipe) is available from Arbor Scientific (www.arborsci.com).
3.
Michael
Ruiz
, “
Lenz's law magic trick
,”
Phys. Teach.
44
,
96
98
(Feb.
2006
).
4.
Horacio
Aguilar
, “
Magnetic levitation and Newton's third law
,”
Phys. Teach.
45
,
278
279
(May
2007
).
5.
Hans
Pfister
, “
How about a magnet and a paper clip?
Phys. Teach.
43
,
95
97
(Feb.
2005
).
6.
Howard
Brand
, “
Action‐reaction at a distance
,”
Phys. Teach.
40
,
136
137
(March
2002
).
7.
Eric
Gettrust
, “
An extraordinary demonstration of Newton's third law
,”
Phys. Teach.
39
,
392
393
(Oct.
2001
).
8.
Charles A.
Sawicki
, “
A Lenz's law experiment revisited
,”
Phys. Teach.
38
,
439
441
(Oct.
2000
);
“Lenz's law: Feel the force,” Phys. Teach.34, 38–39 (Jan. 1996).
9.
William
Lonc
, “
Novel third‐law demonstration
,”
Phys. Teach.
33
,
84
(Feb.
1995
).
10.
Joseph
Priest
and
Bryant
Wade
, “
A Lenz law experiment
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
,
106
108
(Feb.
1992
).
11.
Jhules A.M.
Clack
and
Terrence P.
Toepker
, “
Magnetic induction experiment
,”
Phys. Teach.
28
,
236
238
(April
1990
).
12.
Robert
Chasnov
and
Louis
Overcast
, “
Magnet symmetry and Newton's third law
,”
Phys. Teach.
28
,
112
(Feb.
1990
).
13.
The holes in the tube, constructed for visibility, also mean that the induced currents are impeded when the magnet falls in front of a hole. The resulting short periods of acceleration of the magnet will slightly reduce the average force on the scale.
14.
As the magnet falls through the tube, it may experience some frictional force from the tube walls—this is very small compared to the magnetic braking force, as indicated by the fact that the “dummy” nonmagnetic cylinder accelerates down the tube in near free‐fall time. In any case, as long as the magnet is falling at a constant speed, the sum of the magnetic and frictional forces of the tube will add up to the weight of the magnet, although we are asserting that the magnetic force is by far the dominant contribution (thus, the friction force is neglected in Fig. 2).
15.
John A.
Pelesko
,
Michael
Cesky
and
Sharon
Huertas
, “
Lenz's law and dimensional analysis
,”
Am. J. Phys.
73
,
37
39
(Jan.
2005
).
16.
W.M.
Saslow
, “
Maxwell's theory of eddy currents in thin conducting sheets, and applications to electromagnetic shielding and MAGLEV
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
,
693
711
(Aug.
1992
).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.