I'll outline suggestions for teaching elementary particle physics, often called high energy physics, in high school or introductory college courses for non‐scientists or scientists. Some presentations of this topic simply list the various particles along with their properties, with little overarching structure. Such a laundry list approach is a great way to make a fascinating topic meaningless. Students need a conceptual framework from which to view the elementary particles. That conceptual framework is quantum field theory (QFT). Teachers and students alike tend to quake at this topic, but bear with me. We're talking here about concepts, not technicalities. My approach will be conceptual and suitable for non‐scientists and scientists; if mathematical details are added in courses for future scientists, they should be simple and sparse. Introductory students should not be expected to do QFT, but only to understand its concepts. Those concepts take some getting used to, but they are simple and can be understood by any literate person, be she plumber, attorney, musician, or physicist.

1.
This paper is based loosely on the author's liberal arts physics textbook, Physics: Concepts & Connections, 5th ed. (Addison‐Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2010), Chap. 17.
2.
Steven Weinberg, Facing Up (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001), p. 221.
3.
Howard Stein, in Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science, edited by Roger H. Stuewer (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1989), p. 299.
4.
Albert Einstein and Leopold Infeld, The Evolution of Physics (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1938), p. 151: “Theelectro‐magnetic field is, in Maxwell's theory, something real. The electric field is produced by a changing magnetic field, quite independently, whether or not there is a wire to test its existence; a magnetic field is produced by a changing electric field, whether or not there is a magnetic pole to test its existence.” It's worth noting that this important book is entirely conceptual; there are no equations.
5.
Art
Hobson
, “
Teaching quantum physics without paradoxes
,”
Phys. Teach.
45
,
96
99
(Feb.
2007
);
Art
Hobson
, “
Electrons as field quanta
,”
Am. J. Phys.
73
,
630
634
(July
2005
). This non‐paradoxical approach to quantum physics is incorporated into Ref. 1.
6.
Claus
Jonsson
, “
Electron diffraction at multiple slits
,”
Am. J. Phys.
42
,
4
11
(Jan.
1974
).
7.
A.
Tonomura
,
J.
Endo
,
T.
Matsuda
,
T.
Kawasaki
, and
H.
Exawa
, “
Demonstration of single‐electron buildup of an interference pattern
,”
Am. J. Phys.
57
,
117
(Feb.
1989
).
8.
Isaac Newton, Optics, 1730 edition, p. 344.
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.