Feynman mentioned to us that he understood a topic in physics if he could explain it to a college freshman, a high school student, or a dinner guest. Here we will discuss two topics that took us a while to get to that level. One is the relationship between gravity and time. The other is the minus sign that appears in the Lagrangian. (Why would one subtract potential energy from kinetic energy?) In this paper we discuss a thought experiment that relates gravity and time. Then we use a Feynman thought experiment to explain the minus sign in the Lagrangian. Our surprise was that these two topics are related.
REFERENCES
1.
R.V.
Pound
and G.A.
Rebka
Jr., “Apparent weight of photons
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
4
(7
), 337
–341
(April 1, 1960
).2.
Carl E.
Mungan
, “Relativistic effects on clocks aboard GPS satellites
,” Phys. Teach.
44
, 424
–425
(Oct. 2006
). Mungan discusses the effects of gravity and speed on the timing of the atomic clocks in the satellites.3.
Richard P. Feynman, Fernando B. Moringo, and William G. Wagner, Feynman Lectures on Gravitation (Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995), p. 95. The lectures were given in the academic year 1962–63, a year after I left Caltech. One of the ideas in the lectures, that Feynman learned from my thesis, was that an energy analysis of gravity was not unique, and that an action principle was needed to determine a classical theory of gravity (see top of p. 52).
4.
Clifford
Swartz
, “Physics, where the least action is?
” Phys. Teach.
10
, 516
(1972
). Here you will find a more historical approach to the principle of least action.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2010 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2010
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.