Studies on cognitive aspects of science education, especially how students achieve conceptual change, have been a focus of interest for many years.1 Researchers of student learning and conceptual change have developed several easily applicable teaching strategies. One of these strategies is known as discrepant events. Discrepant events are very powerful ways to stimulate interest, motivate students to challenge their covert science misconceptions, and promote higher‐order thinking skills. The key point is that directly challenging students' naive ideas will lead to more quality science learning going on in the classroom. In this paper, we summarize the research‐based role of discrepant events in conceptual change and we share several highly successful discrepant events we use in our own classes.

Topics
Educational aids, News and events
1.
J.
Park
, “
Modeling analysis of students' processes of generating scientific explanatory hypotheses
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
28
,
469
–
489
(
2006
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
2.
S.
Kang
,
L.C.
Scharmann
,
T.
Noh
, and
H.
Koh
, “
The influence of students' cognitive and motivational variables in respect of cognitive conflict and conceptual change
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ.
27
,
1037
–
1058
(
2005
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
3.
J.
Clement
, “
Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics
,”
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
30
,
1241
–
1257
(
1993
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
4.
D. I.
Dykstra
,
C. F.
Boyle
, and
I. A.
Monarch
, “
Studying conceptual change in learning physics
,”
Sci. Educ.
76
,
615
–
652
(
1992
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
5.
K. Appleton, “Students' responses during discrepant event science lessons,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED393696 (1996).
6.
M.
Limón
, “
On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal
,”
Learn. Instr.
11
,
357
–
380
(
2001
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
7.
E. L.
Wright
 and
G.
Govindarajan
, “
Discrepant event demonstrations
,”
Sci. Teach.
62
,
24
–
28
(
2005
).
Google Scholar
 
8.
M. J. Lynch and J. J. Zenchak, “Use of scientific inquiry to explain counterintuitive observations,” paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED465617 (2002).
9.
D. Mason, W. F. Griffith, S. E. Hogue, K. Holley, and K. Hunter, “Discrepant event: The great bowling ball float‐off,” J. Chem. Educ. 81, 1309–1312.
10.
T.
Slater
, “
The first three minutes … of class
,”
Phys. Teach.
44
,
477
–
478
(Oct.
2006
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
11.
T.
O'Brien
,
C.
Stannard
, and
A.
Telesca
, “
A baker's dozen of discrepantly dense demos
,”
Sci. Scope
18
,
35
–
38
(
1994
).
Google Scholar
 
12.
E. L.
Wright
 and
G.
Govindarajan
, “
Stirring the biology teaching pot with discrepant events
,”
Am. Bio. Teach.
54
,
205
–
207
(
1992
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
13.
D.
Gabel
, “
Enhancing the conceptual understanding of science
,”
Educ. Horiz.
81
,
70
–
76
(
2003
).
Google Scholar
 
14.
J. W.
Rylan der
, “
Welcome to physics
,”
Phys. Teach.
37
,
312
–
313
(May
1999
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
15.
G. T.
Johnston
, “
The scientific method and the cooled super‐ball
,”
Phys. Teach.
16
,
172
–
173
(March
1978
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
16.
A.
Hapkiewicz
, “
Finding a list of science misconceptions
,”
MS‐TANewsletter
38
,
11
–
14
(Winter
1992
); homepage.mac.com/vtalsma/syllabi/2943/handouts/misconcept.html.
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2010 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2010
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.