In sports such as baseball, softball, golf, and tennis, a common objective is to hit the ball as fast or as far as possible. Another common objective is to hit the ball so that it spins as fast as possible, since the trajectory of the ball through the air is strongly affected by ball spin.1 In an attempt to enhance both the coefficient of restitution (COR) and the spin of a golf ball, I conducted several experiments to see what would happen when a 45‐g, 42.8‐mm diameter golf ball bounced on: (a) a 58‐mm diameter, 103‐g Super Ball®; (b) an 8‐mm thick, 56‐mm diameter circular disk of Super Ball material cut from a large Super Ball and glued to a 3.4‐kg lead brick; and (c) a 3‐mm thick sheet of rubber glued to a 3.4‐kg lead brick. (See Fig. 1.)

1.
A.
Nathan
, “
The effect of spin on the flight of a baseball
,”
Am. J. Phys.
76
,
119
124
(Feb.
2008
).
2.
R.
Cross
, “
Measurements of the horizontal coefficient of restitution for a superball and a tennis ball
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
,
482
489
(May
2002
).
3.
R.
Cross
, “
Grip‐slip behavior of a bouncing ball
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
,
1093
1102
(Nov.
2002
).
4.
R.
Cross
, “
Bounce of a spinning ball near normal incidence
,”
Am. J. Phys.
73
,
914
920
(Oct.
2005
).
5.
R.
Cross
, “
Differences between bouncing balls, springs, and rods
,”
Am. J. Phys.
76
,
908
915
(Oct.
2008
).
6.
R.
Cross
, “
Impact of a ball on a surface with tangential compliance
,”
Am. J. Phys.
78
,
716
719
(July
2010
).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.