Throughout North America the curriculum of introductory physics courses is nearly standardized. In 1992, Tobias wrote that four texts dominate 90% of the introductory physics market1 and current physics education research is focusing on how to sustain educational reforms.2 The instructional team at the University of British Columbia (UBC) recently implemented some key curriculum and pedagogical changes in Physics 100, their algebra‐based introductory course for non‐physics majors. These changes were aimed at improving their students' attitudes toward physics and their ability to apply physics concepts to useful real‐life situations. In order to demonstrate that physics is relevant to real life, a theme of energy and environment was incorporated into the course.

1.
S. Tobias, Revitalizing Undergraduate Science: Why some things work and most don't. An occasional paper on neglected problems in science education (Research Corp., Tucson, AZ, 1992).
2.
S. J.
Pollock
and
N. D.
Finkelstein
, “
Sustaining educational reforms in introductory physics
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Rev.
4
,
101010
(
2008
).
3.
R. D.
Porter
, “
Phenomenological physics: Maine Township H.S. West style
,”
Phys. Teach.
10
,
193
195
(April
1972
).
4.
E. C.
Holton
, “
Editorial: Issues for the seventies
,”
Phys. Teach.
8
,
229
232
(May
1970
).
5.
T.
Liao
and
E. J.
Piel
, “
Let's get relevant
,”
Phys. Teach.
8
,
74
82
(Feb.
1970
).
6.
D. N.
Arion
,
K. M.
Crosby
, and
E. A.
Murphy
, “
Case‐study experiments in the introductory physics curriculum
,”
Phys. Teach.
38
,
373
376
(Sept.
2000
).
7.
D. J.
Cowan
, “
Environmental topics in an undergraduate physics curriculum
,”
Am. J. Phys.
40
,
1748
1756
(Dec.
1972
).
8.
S. F.
Singer
, “
Education for today's ecological crisis
,”
Sci. Educ.
54
,
349
358
(Oct.–Nov.
1970
).
9.
R.
Gerson
, “
Experience with an environment‐related physics course
,”
Phys. Teach.
11
,
236
237
(April
1973
).
10.
J. M.
Pratte
, “
Engaging physics students using environmental lab modules
,”
Phys. Teach.
44
,
301
303
(May
2006
).
11.
K. P.
Brown
and
P. W.
Laws
, “
Exploring the greenhouse effect through physics‐oriented activities
,”
Phys. Educ.
38
,
115
122
(March
2003
).
12.
P.
Heller
and
M.
Hollabaugh
, “
Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
,
637
644
(July
1992
).
13.
W. K.
Adams
,
K. K.
Perkins
,
N. S.
Podolefsky
,
M.
Dubson
,
N. D.
Finkelstein
, and
C. E.
Wieman
, “
New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey
,”
Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Rev.
2
,
10101
(
2006
); www.colorado.edu/sei/class/.
14.
Likert questions ask students to indicate their level of agreement or disagreement to a statement on a multi‐point scale. The CLASS questions are of the following format: Choose one of the above five choices that best expresses your feeling about the statement. If you don't understand a statement, leave it blank. If you have no strong opinion, choose Neutral. “I think about the physics I experience in everyday life.” Strongly Agree / Agree / Neutral / Disagree / Strongly Disagree
15.
E. F.
Redish
,
J. M.
Saul
, and
R. N.
Steinberg
, “
Student expectations in introductory physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
212
224
(March
1998
).
16.
W. K. Adams, Development of a Problem Solving Evaluation Instrument; Untangling of Specific Problem Solving Skills, PhD dissertation, University of Colorado, 2007 (unpublished).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.