The normalized gain, g, has been an important tool for the characterization of conceptual improvement in physics courses since its use in Hake's extensive study on conceptual learning in introductory physics.1 The normalized gain is calculated from the score on a pre‐test administered before instruction and a post‐test administered after instruction and is defined as g = post-test − pre-test/100 − pre-test, (1) where both the pre‐test and post‐test have a maximum score of 100. The statistic has been used in many published works since Hake's paper. It has become sufficiently important that extensions to the statistic2 and investigations of its detailed properties3 have recently been published. This paper investigates the effect of students' guessing on the normalized gain and develops a correction for guessing for the pre‐test and post‐test. The normalized gain is found to be insensitive to the effects of guessing.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2010
PAPERS|
March 01 2010
Correcting the Normalized Gain for Guessing
John Stewart;
John Stewart
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Search for other works by this author on:
Gay Stewart
Gay Stewart
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Search for other works by this author on:
Phys. Teach. 48, 194–196 (2010)
Citation
John Stewart, Gay Stewart; Correcting the Normalized Gain for Guessing. Phys. Teach. 1 March 2010; 48 (3): 194–196. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3317458
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
A “Perpetual Motion Machine” Powered by Electromagnetism
Hollis Williams
Jack Reacher and the Deployment of an Airbag
Gregory A. DiLisi, Richard A. Rarick
Related Content
Mixture Rasch model for guessing group identification
AIP Conference Proceedings (April 2013)
Want to Reduce Guessing and Cheating While Making Students Happier? Give More Exams!
Phys. Teach. (December 2012)
Learning Gains in Introductory Astronomy: Online Can Be as Good as Face-to-Face
The Physics Teacher (May 2014)
Analyzing force concept inventory with item response theory
Am. J. Phys. (October 2010)
Ring Falling into a Chain: No Magic — Just Physics
Phys. Teach. (September 2011)