A pair of masses or opposite‐sign charges released from rest will move directly toward each other under the action of the inverse‐distance‐squared force of attraction between them. An exact expression for the separation distance as a function of time can only be found by numerically inverting the solution of a differential equation. A simpler, approximate formula can be obtained by combining dimensional analysis, Kepler's third law, and the familiar quadratic dependence of distance on time for a mass falling near Earth's surface. These exact and approximate results are applied to several interesting examples: the flight time and maximum altitude attained by an object fired straight upward from Earth's surface; the time required for an asteroid of known starting position and speed to cross Earth's orbit if it is bearing toward the Sun; and the collision time of two oppositely charged particles starting from rest.

1.
By eliminating r2 between the two equations r ≡ r1 + r2 and mr1 = Mr2, one can quickly show that μr = mr1. Differentiating both sides with respect to time proves that μv = mv1. Differentiating again gives μa = ma1. Then Eq. (1) is equivalent to Newton's second law for particle 1. Alternatively one can establish that μv = Mv2 and μa = Ma2, identifying Eq. (1) as Newton's second law for particle 2. Note that ma1 = Ma2 in agreement with Newton's third law.
2.
S. Van
Wyk
,
“Problem: The falling Earth” and “Solution”
,
Am. J. Phys.
54
,
913
&
945
(
Oct. 1986
).
3.
A. J.
Mallmann
,
J. L.
Hock
, and
K. M.
Ogden
, “
Surprising facts about gravitational forces
,”
Phys. Teach.
32
,
492
495
(
Nov. 1994
).
4.
M. B.
Stewart
, “
Falling and orbiting
,”
Phys. Teach.
36
,
122
125
(
Feb. 1998
).
5.
J.
Gallant
and
J.
Carlson
, “
Long‐distance free fall
, “
Phys. Teach.
37
,
166
167
(
March 1999
) and Errata & Comments on pages 261–262 of the May 1999 issue.
6.
M.
McCall
, “
Gravitational orbits in one dimension
,”
Am. J. Phys.
74
,
1115
1119
(
Dec. 2006
).
7.
C. F.
Bohren
, “
Dimensional analysis, falling bodies, and the fine art of not solving differential equations
,”
Am. J. Phys.
72
,
534
537
(
April 2004
).
8.
E. D.
Noll
, “
Kepler's third law for elliptical orbits
,”
Phys. Teach.
34
,
42
43
(
Jan. 1996
). A paper of the same title with essentially the same derivation has been published by R. Weinstock in Am. J. Phys. 30, 813–814 (Nov. 1962).
9.
A. J.
Mallinckrodt
, “
Falling into the sun
,”
Phys. Teach.
36
,
324
(
Sept. 1998
).
10.
Let the fractional discrepancy between the exact and approximate values of T be f(R) ≡ (Texact − Tapprox)/Texact. Then I define the mean discrepancy to be the square root of the integral of f2 from R = 0 to R = 1, in accordance with the usual statistical idea of variance.
11.
Problem adapted from
B.
Korsunsky
, “
Physics Challenge for Teachers and Students: The drill team rocks!
Phys. Teach.
45
,
568
(
Dec. 2007
).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.