The Physics First movement—teaching a true physics course to ninth-grade students—is gaining popularity in high schools. There are several different rhetorical arguments for and against this movement, and it is quite controversial in physics education. However, there is no actual evidence to assess the success, or failure, of this substantial shift in the science teaching sequence. We have undertaken a comparison study of physics classes taught in ninth- and 12th-grade classes in Maine. Comparisons of student understanding and gains with respect to mechanics concepts were made with excerpts from well-known multiple-choice surveys and individual student interviews. Results indicate that both populations begin physics courses with similar content knowledge and specific difficulties, but when learning concepts, ninth-graders are more sensitive to the instructional method used.

1.
U.
Haber-Schaim
, “
In my opinion… high school physics should be taught before chemistry and biology
,”
Phys. Teach.
22
,
330
332
(May
1984
).
2.
F.
Meyers
, Jr.
, “
A case for a better high school science sequence in the 21st century
,”
Phys. Teach.
25
,
78
81
(Feb.
1987
).
3.
M. G.
Bardeen
and
L.
Lederman
, “
Coherence in science education
,”
Sci.
281
,
178
179
(July
1998
).
4.
J.
Palombi
, “
The illogic of teaching bio before chem and physics
,”
Phys. Teach.
9
,
39
40
(Jan.
1971
).
5.
D. K.
Hamilton
, “
Physics and the high school sophomore
,”
Phys. Teach.
8
,
457
458
(Nov.
1970
).
6.
S. Pasero, “The state of Physics-First programs,” Project ARISE, June 2001.
7.
H. Glasser, “The effect of ninth-grade physics in one private school on students' performance on the mathematics section of the PSAT,” (1999). Downloaded from http://www-ed.fnal.gov/arise. Last accessed February 17, 2007.
8.
O.
Livanis
, “
What was I thinking?
Phys. Teach.
44
,
280
282
(May
2006
).
9.
O.
Dreon
, Jr.
, “
A study of Physics First curricula in Pennsylvania
,”
Phys. Teach.
44
,
521
523
(Nov.
2006
).
10.
Boris
Korsunsky
and
Ozymandias
Agar
, “
Physics First? Survey first!
Phys. Teach.
46
,
15
18
(Jan.
2008
).
11.
Robert
Goodman
and
Eugenia
Etkina
, “
Squaring the circle: A mathematically rigorous Physics First
,”
Phys. Teach.
46
,
222
227
(April
2008
).
12.
K. Marrongelle, K. Black, and D. Meredith, “Studio calculus physics: Interdisciplinary mathematics with active learning,” in Integrated Mathematics: Choices and Challenges (Sue Ann McGraw, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2003).
13.
Philip M.
Sadler
and
Robert H.
Tai
, “
The two high-school pillars, supporting college science
,”
Sci.
317
,
457
458
(July
2007
).
14.
M.
Wells
,
D.
Hestenes
, and
G.
Swackhamer
, “
A modeling method for high school physics instruction
,”
Am. J. Phys.
63
,
606
619
(July
1995
).
15.
P. Hewitt, Conceptual Physics, 10th ed. (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2005).
16.
M. Neuschatz and M. McFarling, “Broadening the base: High school physics education at the turn of a new century” (2003). Downloaded from http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/highlite/hs2001/hshigh.htm. Last accessed November 11, 2007.
17.
J. Jackson, personal communication.
18.
D.
Hestenes
,
M.
Wells
, and
G.
Swackhamer
, “
Force Concept Inventory
,”
Phys. Teach.
30
,
141
158
(March
1992
).
19.
R. K.
Thornton
and
D. R.
Sokoloff
, “
Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
338
352
(April
1998
).
20.
R. J.
Beichner
, “
Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs
,”
Am. J. Phys.
62
,
750
762
(Aug.
1994
).
21.
R. R.
Hake
, “
Interactive engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
64
74
(Jan.
1998
).
22.
D. Hestenes, “Findings of the Modeling Workshop Project,” excerpt from Final Report submitted to the National Science Foundation for the Teacher Enhancement grant Modeling Instruction in High School Physics. Downloaded from http://modeling.asu.edu/r&e/research.html. Last accessed November 11, 2007.
23.
A.
Hobson
, “
Considering Physics First
,”
Phys. Teach.
43
,
485
(Nov.
2005
).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.