A question we posed in a recent final examination has uncovered a fundamental difficulty for students in understanding destructive interference. The problem stated that glass of index n3 was coated with a thin film of a substance with index n2. The question then asked the student to calculate (a) the minimum coating thickness for maximum transmission into the glass and (b) the minimum thickness for minimum transmission into the glass, in both cases for a given wavelength. Questions from students during and after the examination showed that many had a problem in relating the interference to the transmission. We finally concluded that the source of confusion lay with an almost universally used figure in teaching interference in thin films, as well as the omission of the role of the electric field in reflection.

Topics
Thin films, Education, Teaching
1.
R. Feynman, R. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Commemorative Issue, Vol. I (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989), pp. 28-3–28-6.
2.
B. Rossi, Optics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1957), pp. 334–343.
3.
D. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall India, New Delhi, 2002), sec. 9.3.2, pp. 384 – 386.
4.
B.
Ambrose
,
P.
Shaffer
,
R.
Steinberg
, and
L.
McDermott
, “
An investigation of student understanding of single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
146
–
155
(Feb.
1999
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2009 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2009
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.