This paper describes a course aimed at developing understanding of measurement and uncertainty in the introductory physics laboratory. The course materials, in the form of a student workbook, are based on the probabilistic framework for measurement as recommended by the International Organization for Standardization in their publication Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM).
REFERENCES
1.
C.
Eisenhart
, “Expression of the uncertainties of final results
,” Sci.
23
, 1201
–1204
(June 1968
).2.
P.R. Bevington, and D.K. Robinson, Data Reduction and Error Analysis, 3rd ed. (McGraw Hill, New York, 2003).
3.
J.R. Taylor, An Introduction to Error Analysis, 2nd ed. (University Science Books, Sausalito, CA, 1997).
4.
S.
Allie
, A.
Buffler
, B.
Campbell
, F.
Lubben
, D.
Evangelinos
, D.
Psillos
, and O.
Valassiades
, “Teaching measurement in the introductory physics laboratory
,” Phys. Teach.
41
, 394
–401
(Oct. 2003
).5.
W.
Bich
, M. G.
Cox
, and P. M.
Harris
, “Evolution of the ‘Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement,’
” Metrologia
43
, S161
–S166
(Aug. 2006
).6.
R.
Kacker
, K.-D.
Sommer
, and R.
Kessel
, “Evolution of modern approaches to express uncertainty in measurement
,” Metrologia
44
, 513
–529
(Dec. 2007
).7.
BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1995, ISBN 92-67-10188-9).
8.
B.N. Taylor and C.E. Kuyatt, Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results. NIST Technical Report TN1297 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1994).
9.
G.
D'Agostini
, “Teaching statistics in the physics curriculum: Unifying and clarifying the role of subjective probability
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
, 1260
–1268
(Dec. 1999
).10.
L.
Kirkup
, “A guide to GUM
,” Eur. J. Phys.
23
, 483
–487
(Sept. 2002
).11.
J.
Ryder
and J.
Leach
, “Interpreting experimental data: The views of upper secondary school and university science students
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
22
, 1069
–1084
(Oct. 2000
).12.
M.-G.
Séré
, R.
Journeaux
, and C.
Larcher
, “Learning the statistical analysis of measurement error
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
15
, 427
–438
(1993
).13.
R. L.
Kung
, “Teaching the concept of measurement: An example of a concept-based laboratory course
,” Am. J. Phys.
73
, 771
–777
(Aug. 2005
).14.
A.
Buffler
, S.
Allie
, F.
Lubben
, and B.
Campbell
, “The development of first year physics students' ideas about measurement in terms of point and set paradigms
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
23
, 1137
–1156
(Nov. 2001
).15.
A. Buffler, S. Allie, F. Lubben, and B. Campbell, Introduction to Measurement in the Physics Laboratory. A Probabilistic Approach, Ed. 3.4 (Department of Physics, University of Cape Town, 2007). Can be downloaded and used by instructors from http://www.phy.uct.ac.za/people/buffler/labmanual.html.
16.
F.
Lubben
, A.
Buffler
, S.
Allie
, and B.
Campbell
, “Point and set reasoning in practical science measurement by entrant university freshmen
,” Sci. Educ.
85
, 311
–327
(July 2001
).17.
L. Kirkup and R.B. Frenkel, An Introduction to Uncertainty in Measurement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006).
18.
S.
Pillay
, A.
Buffler
, S.
Allie
and F.
Lubben
, “Effectiveness of a GUM-compliant course for teaching measurement in the introductory physics laboratory
,” Eur. J. Phys.
29
, 647
–659
(2008
).
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2008 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2008
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
