For more than a hundred years there has been a debate about the sequence in which high school science should be taught. Many advocates of “Physics First” support a more conceptual ninth-grade physics course followed by chemistry and then biology while supporters of mathematically rigorous physics favor a sequence of biology-chemistry-physics. This paper describes a new approach that incorporates some of the best arguments from both sides. The main idea is to teach a mathematically rigorous ninth-grade physics course based on algebra alone, avoiding trigonometry.1,2 By selecting topics from the AP Physics B curriculum that form a foundation for both chemistry and biology, one can establish an efficient science sequence. The goal of this paper is to describe this new approach to Physics First and present data supporting its effectiveness.

1.
R. Goodman, “A New High School Program and Its Effect on Student Achievement in Mathematics and Science,” in Science Education (Rutgers University Graduate School of Education, New Brunswick, NJ, 2006).
2.
R. Goodman and E. Etkina, “Mathematical Rigor + Physics First = Improved Science Achievement.” Submitted to School Science and Mathematics, 2007.
3.
K.
Sheppard
, “
Physics First
,”
Principal Leadership
3
,
67
70
(Sept.
2002
).
4.
U.
Haber-Schaim
, “
High school physics should be taught before chemistry and biology
,”
Phys. Teach.
22
,
330
332
(May
1984
).
5.
L. M.
Lederman
, “
A new high school science curriculum
,”
Phys. Today
48
,
11
13
(April
1995
).
6.
L. M.
Lederman
, “
Getting high school science in order
,”
Tech. Rev.
99
,
61
63
(April
1996
).
7.
L. M.
Lederman
, “
Revolution in science education: Put physics first!
Phys. Today
54
,
11
12
(Sept.
2001
).
8.
L. M. Lederman, “The Role of Physics in Education,” in Biology and the Physics First Curriculum: A Symposium Celebrating BSCS's 45th Anniversary (BSCS, Colorado Spring, CO, 2003).
9.
L. M.
Lederman
, “
Physics first?
Phys. Teach.
43
,
6
7
(Jan.
2005
).
10.
M. G.
Bardeen
and
L. M.
Lederman
, “
Science education: Coherence in science education
,”
Sci.
281
,
178
179
(
1998
).
11.
G.
Ewald
et al., “
Physics first: The right-side-up science sequence
,”
Phys. Teach.
43
,
319
320
(May
2005
).
12.
P.
Hickman
, “
Freshman physics?
Sci. Teach.
57
,
45
47
(
1990
).
13.
View the online appendix at E-PHTEAH-46-011804
http://ftp.aip.org/cgi-bin/epaps?ID=E-PHTEAH-46-011804). For more information on EPAPS, see http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.
14.
E.J.Gonzalez, K.M. O'Connor, and J.A. Miles, How Well Do Advanced Placement Students Perform on the TIMSS Advanced Mathematics and Physics Tests? (The International Study Center, Boston College, 2001).
15.
The College Board, Frequently Asked Questions About the AP Program. 2006; Available from: http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/prof/advance-placement-qa.pdf. The chart appears on page 4 of this pdf.
This content is only available via PDF.

Supplementary Material

AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.