Most physics instructors are motivated by a genuine interest in their subject area and in using physics to understand real-world phenomena. While many premedical students may share these interests, most are motivated by fulfilling their degree requirements and gaining admittance into medical school. To achieve this latter goal, they need excellent grades and have to do well on the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT),1 which includes a physical sciences section that may not coincide with the learning goals of many physics courses. Too often both sides simply give up, and courses come to some kind of unspoken agreement of how to go through the motions of completing the course with the least amount of mutual aggravation, while real physics falls by the wayside. But how exactly does this discrepancy manifest itself, and what—if anything other than giving up—can be done about it? In this paper, I first survey learner beliefs, expectations, and preferences and then attempt to identify approaches and resources that may partly address the identified issues.

1.
American Association of Medical Colleges, “Medical College Admission Test,” http://www.aamc.org/students/mcat/.
2.
See
E.F.
Redish
,
R. N.
Steinberg
, and
J. M.
Saul
's discussion of the Maryland Physics Expectations Survey in “
Student expectations in introductory physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
66
,
212
224
(March
1998
).
3.
S. B.
Nichparenko
, “
Premed physics: What and why
,”
J. Coll. Sci. Teach.
14
,
391
(April
1985
).
4.
H.
Lin
, “
Learning physics vs. passing courses
,”
Phys. Teach.
20
,
151
157
(March
1982
).
5.
E. Torigoe, “Student difficulties with equations in physics,” ISAAPT Spring Meeting, Urbana, IL (2004).
6.
E.
Breitenberger
, “
The mathematical knowledge of physics graduates: Primary data and conclusions
,”
Am. J. Phys.
60
,
318
323
(April
1992
).
7.
J.
Clement
,
J.
Lochhead
, and
G. S.
Monk
, “
Translation difficulties in learning mathematics
,”
Am. Math. Mon.
88
,
286
(April
1981
).
8.
D.
Meltzer
, “
The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible ‘hidden variable’ in diagnostic pretest scores
,”
Am. J. Phys.
70
,
1259
1268
(Dec.
2002
).
9.
J. Kane and M. Sternheim, General Physics (Wiley, New York, 1991).
10.
J. Marion, General Physics with Bioscience Essays (Wiley, New York, 1979).
11.
G.B. Benedek and F.M.H. Villars, Physics with Illustrative Examples from Medicine and Biology (Series), (Springer Verlag, New York, 2000).
12.
R.K. Hobbie, Intermediate Physics for Medicine and Biology (Springer Verlag, New York, 1997).
13.
P. Davidovits, Physics in Biology and Medicine (Complementary Science) (Academic Press, New York, 2001).
14.
R. K.
Hobbie
, “
Physics useful to a medical student
,”
Am. J. Phys.
42
,
121
132
(Feb.
1975
).
15.
R. K.
Hobbie
, “
Resource letter MP-1: Medical physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
53
,
822
829
(Sept.
1985
).
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.