Assessment designed to enhance teaching and learning is called “formative assessment.” During formative assessment, teachers and students seek information about the state of student learning and then use the acquired information to adapt teaching and learning to meet student needs. “Classroom formative assessment” (CFA) requires that teachers explicitly engage in formative assessment during classroom learning activities. At a basic level, CFA occurs naturally and is a common part of most instructional settings. Nevertheless, the systematic practice of CFA is rare in secondary and post-secondary science education. Here we provide suggestions for those interested in formative assessment for use in teaching introductory physics. A simple model of classroom formative assessment is presented. Included are examples of formative assessment activities and suggestions for implementation.

1.
P.
Black
and
D.
William
, “
Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment
,”
Phi Delta Kappan
80
(
2
),
139
148
(
1998
); online at http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/kbla9810.htm.
2.
National Research Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, edited by J.R. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1999).
3.
National Research Council, Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards, edited by J.M. Atkin, P. Black, and J. Coffey (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2001).
4.
R.J. Dufresne, W.J. Gerace, J.P. Mestre, and W.J. Leonard, ASK-IT/A2L: Assessing Student Knowledge with Instructional Technology (2000); online at http://umperg.physics.umass.edu/library/UMPERG-2000-09.
5.
Robert J.
Dufresne
,
William J.
Gerace
,
William J.
Leonard
,
Jose P.
Mestre
, and
Laura
Wenk
, “
Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning
,”
J. Comp. High. Educ.
7
(
2
),
3
47
(
1996
).
6.
Laura Wenk, Robert Dufresne, William Gerace, William Leonard, and Jose Mestre, “Technology-assisted active learning in large lectures,” Student-active Science: Models of Innovation in College Science Teaching, edited by Ann P. McNeal and Charlene D'Avanzo (Saunders, Orlando, FL, 1997), pp. 431–451.
7.
R. A.
Burnstein
and
L. M.
Lederman
, “
Comparison of different commercial wireless keypad systems
,”
Phys. Teach.
41
,
272
275
(May
2003
).
8.
I.D. Beatty, “Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems,” Educause Center for Applied Research (ECAR) Bulletin ERB0403 (Feb. 3, 2004).
9.
D. E.
Meltzer
and
K.
Manivannan
, “
Promoting interactivity in physics lecture classes
,”
Phys. Teach.
34
,
72
77
(Feb.
1996
).
10.
R. A.
Burnstein
and
L. M.
Lederman
, “
Using wireless keypads in lecture classes
,”
Phys. Teach.
39
,
8
11
(Jan.
2001
).
11.
D. W.
Bullock
,
V. P.
LaBella
,
T.
Clingan
,
Z.
Ding
,
G.
Stewart
, and
P. M.
Thibado
, “
Enhancing the student-instructor interaction frequency
,”
Phys. Teach.
40
,
535
541
(Dec.
2002
).
12.
The examples of assessing-to-learn items presented here are based on materials contained in the Minds-On-Physics curriculum published by Kendall/Hunt.
This content is only available via PDF.
AAPT members receive access to The Physics Teacher and the American Journal of Physics as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.