Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Issues

Letters To The Editor

Am. J. Phys. 64, 523 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18268
Am. J. Phys. 64, 523 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18269
Am. J. Phys. 64, 523 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18270
Am. J. Phys. 64, 523–524 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18271
Am. J. Phys. 64, 524 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18275

Questions and Answers

Am. J. Phys. 64, 525–526 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18142
Am. J. Phys. 64, 525 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18267
Am. J. Phys. 64, 525 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18272
Am. J. Phys. 64, 525 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18276
Am. J. Phys. 64, 526 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18143
Am. J. Phys. 64, 526–527 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18144
Am. J. Phys. 64, 527–528 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18145
Am. J. Phys. 64, 528 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18146
Am. J. Phys. 64, 528–529 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18147

Guest Comment

Am. J. Phys. 64, 530–531 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18148

Papers

Am. J. Phys. 64, 532–538 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18149
Am. J. Phys. 64, 539–541 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18150
Am. J. Phys. 64, 541–546 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18151
Am. J. Phys. 64, 546–552 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18152
Am. J. Phys. 64, 552–556 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18153
Am. J. Phys. 64, 557–565 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18154
Am. J. Phys. 64, 565–568 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18155
Am. J. Phys. 64, 568–570 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18265
Am. J. Phys. 64, 571–574 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18156
Am. J. Phys. 64, 575–580 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18157
Am. J. Phys. 64, 580–583 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18158
Am. J. Phys. 64, 583–588 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18159
Am. J. Phys. 64, 589–593 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18459
Am. J. Phys. 64, 593–597 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18160
Am. J. Phys. 64, 597–601 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18161
Am. J. Phys. 64, 602–606 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18162
Am. J. Phys. 64, 607–610 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18266
Am. J. Phys. 64, 610–613 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18163
Am. J. Phys. 64, 614–617 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18164
Am. J. Phys. 64, 618–620 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18165
Am. J. Phys. 64, 621–623 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18166
Am. J. Phys. 64, 623–632 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18167
Am. J. Phys. 64, 633–644 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18168
Am. J. Phys. 64, 644–648 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18259
Am. J. Phys. 64, 649–654 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18260

Notes and Discussions

Am. J. Phys. 64, 655–656 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18261
Am. J. Phys. 64, 655 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18476
Am. J. Phys. 64, 656–660 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18262
Am. J. Phys. 64, 660–661 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18263

New Problems

Am. J. Phys. 64, 662–666 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18264

Book Reviews

Am. J. Phys. 64, 667–668 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18443
Am. J. Phys. 64, 667 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18454
Am. J. Phys. 64, 668–670 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18432
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal