A lossless beamsplitter has certain (complex-valued) probability amplitudes for sending an incoming photon into one of two possible directions. We use elementary laws of classical and quantum optics to obtain general relations among the magnitudes and phases of these probability amplitudes. Proceeding to examine a pair of (nearly) single-mode wavepackets in the number-states n 1 and n 2 that simultaneously arrive at the splitter's input ports, we find the distribution of photon-number states at the output ports using an argument inspired by Feynman's scattering analysis of indistinguishable Bose particles. The result thus obtained coincides with that of the standard quantum-optical treatment of beamsplitters via annihilation and creation operators a ̂ and a ̂ †⁠. A simple application of the Feynman method provides a form of justification for the Bose enhancement implicit in the well-known formulas a ̂ n = n n − 1 and a ̂ † n = n + 1 n + 1⁠.

1.
L.
Mandel
 and
E.
Wolf
,
Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics
(
Cambridge U. P
.,
Cambridge
,
1995
). Examples of application of beamsplitters in classical and quantum optical experiments can be found on pp. 316, 511, and 639. Canonical quantization of the electromagnetic field as well as elementary properties of the photon-number states are discussed in Chap. 10, Sec. 3, starting on p. 473.
Google Scholar
 
2.
G.
Grynberg
,
A.
Aspect
, and
C.
Fabre
,
Introduction to Quantum Optics
(
Cambridge U. P
.,
Cambridge
,
2010
); Chap. 5, Sec. 1, describes the properties of beamsplitters and their application in quantum-optical experiments. Quantized radiation states and photons are the subject of Chap. 4, Sec. 6.
Google Scholar
 
3.
R. J.
Glauber
, “
The quantum theory of coherence
,”
Phys. Rev.
130
,
2529
–
2539
(
1963
).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.130.2529
Google Scholar
 
4.
C.
Cohen-Tannoudji
,
J.
Dupont-Roc
, and
G.
Grynberg
,
Photons & Atoms: Introduction to Quantum Electrodynamics
(
Wiley
,
New York
,
1989
). Elementary excitations of the quantized free field (photons) are discussed in Chap. 3, Sec. C.2, starting on p. 186.
Google Scholar
 
5.
M.
Born
 and
E.
Wolf
,
Principles of Optics
, 7th ed. (
Cambridge U. P
.,
Cambridge
,
1999
). For a discussion of the Fresnel reflection and transmission coefficients at the planar interface between two dielectric media, see Sec. 1.5.2, pp. 40–43. For a description of the Michelson interferometer, see Sec. 7.5.4, pp.
334
–
336
.
Google Scholar
 
6.
J. D.
Jackson
,
Classical Electrodynamics
, 3rd ed. (
Wiley
,
New York
,
1999
). The Fresnel reflection and transmission coefficients are described in Chap. 7, Sec. 3, starting on page 302. Time reversal symmetry in classical physics, in general, and in Maxwellian electrodynamics, in particular, is described in Chap. 6, Sec. 10, Subsection C (p.
270
).
Google Scholar
 
7.
M.
Mansuripur
,
Classical Optics and Its Applications
, 2nd ed. (
Cambridge U. P.
,
Cambridge
,
2009
); see Chap. 17, “Reciprocity in classical linear optics,” where the consequences of time reversal symmetry for lossless multilayer dielectric stacks are described in pp. 235–237.
Google Scholar
 
8.
M. V.
Klein
,
Optics
(
Wiley
,
New York
,
1970
). Reflection and transmission of light at a planar interface between two linear, isotropic, and homogeneous media are discussed in Chap. 11, Sec. 3, starting on p.
567
.
Google Scholar
 
9.
M.
Mansuripur
,
Field, Force, Energy and Momentum in Classical Electrodynamics
, revised ed. (
Bentham Science Publishers
,
Sharjah
,
2017
); Chap. 7, Sec. 6, pp. 193–196 describes the Fresnel reflection and transmission coefficients.
Google Scholar
 
10.
For there to be an arrival time and an exit time, the incoming electromagnetic fields must be in the form of multimode wavepackets with large cross-sectional areas and long durations to properly approximate single-mode photon-number states—hence our use of the qualifier “nearly” when referencing single-mode wavepackets. When discussing two packets that arrive simultaneously at the input ports 1 and 2 of a beamsplitter, we envision identical packets whose leading edges arrive simultaneously at the entrance ports. In a thought experiment, one may imagine packets as large as they need to be for the approximation to reach the desired level of accuracy. In practice, optical wavepackets with cross-sectional areas of about 1   c m 2 and durations of a few nanoseconds will probably suffice.
11.
R. P.
Feynman
,
R. B.
Leighton
, and
M.
Sands
,
The Feynman Lectures on Physics
(
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, Massachusetts
,
1965
), Vol.
III
, Chap. 4, Secs. 2 and 3.
Google Scholar
 
12.
A.
Yariv
 and
D. M.
Pepper
, “
Amplified reflection, phase conjugation, and oscillation in degenerate four-wave mixing
,”
Opt. Lett.
1
,
16
–
18
(
1977
).
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.1.000016
Google Scholar
 
13.
The symmetry is not needed for our initial discussion, but will be invoked later, when we extend the argument to the case of incoming wavepackets with n 1 and n 2 photons simultaneously arriving at ports 1 and 2. Strictly speaking, even in the latter case, the symmetry of the splitter is merely convenient but not necessary for the validity of the argument.
14.
While the time interval Δ t in a practical setup might include the measurement time plus a photocell reset time (following each single-photon detection event), for the purposes of our thought experiment, the reset time is taken to be vanishingly small. We are also ignoring the possibility that two or more photons might arrive simultaneously within a single detection cell, since the available cells vastly outnumber the incoming photons. The ultimate justification for such assumptions is that our final results coincide with those obtained by the conventional methods of quantum optics, as demonstrated in Sec. IV.
15.
R. P.
Feynman
,
QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter
(
Princeton U. P
.,
Princeton, New Jersey
,
1986
).
Google Scholar
 
16.
C. K.
Hong
,
Z. Y.
Ou
, and
L.
Mandel
, “
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
59
,
2044
–
2046
(
1987
).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2044
Google Scholar
 
17.
Assigning a probability to stimulated emission when none of the incident photons participate in the process might seem questionable. Recall, however, that the quantum rule a ̂ † 0 = 1 allows for the stimulation of the excited atom by vacuum fluctuations.
18.
S. M.
Barnett
, “
Schrödinger picture analysis of the beam splitter: An application of the Janszky representation
,”
J. Russ. Laser Res.
39
,
340
–
348
(
2018
).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-018-9727-z
Google Scholar
 
© 2023 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by American Association of Physics Teachers.
2023
Author(s)
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.