In 1977, Michel Hénon proved a remarkable theorem for planar N-body orbits in power-law potentials that relates the rate of change of the perihelion angle (the precession rate), the rate of change of the period evaluated at constant energy, the angular momentum of an orbit, and the power law of the potential. We provide a simple proof of this theorem for two bodies in periodic orbits that interact via a radial power-law force, which is, of course, equivalent to a one-body problem with a power-law central potential. We discuss this theorem's underlying assumptions and implications, including its relation to Bertrand's and Bohlin's theorems, and we illustrate it with several numerically calculated examples.
REFERENCES
1.
L. D.
Landau
and
E. M.
Lifshitz
, Mechanics
, 3rd ed. (
Butterworth-Heinemann
,
Oxford
, 1976
), Sec. 10.2.
3.
G. L.
Kotkin
and
V. G.
Serbo
, Collection of Problems in Classical Mechanics
(
Pergamon
,
Oxford
, 1971
); see, e.g., problems 2.17, 2.19, 2.20, and 2.21 in Sec. II.4.
M.
Hénon
, “
A relation in families of periodic solutions
,” Celest. Mech.
15
, 99
–105
(1977
).5.
“Power-law” and “homogeneous” are synonyms in the context of one- and two-body problems, as there is only one distance variable involved. That is not the case anymore as the number of bodies increases.
6.
Indeed, these scaling laws are so simple that they are often overlooked in textbooks on theoretical physics, one significant exception being Landau–Lifshitz (Ref. 1); whereas, at the other extreme, they are called “engineering” rules (Ref. 31) and/or are widely ignored. In stark contrast, the scaling properties of continua, both classical and quantum, such as those of phase transitions in statistical mechanics, or of quantum fields, are highly non-trivial—having been the subject of intense research for decades with many significant new results and no end in sight.
7.
M. K.
Bohlin
, “
Note sur le probléme des deux corps et sur une intégration nouvelle dans le probléme des trois corps
,” Bull. Astron.
28
, 113
–119
(1911
).9.
E.
Kasner
, Differential-Geometric Aspects of Dynamics
(
American Mathematical Society
,
Providence
, 1913
).10.
Laurence
Mittag
and
Michael J.
Stephen
, “
Conformal transformations and the application of complex variables in mechanics and quantum mechanics
,” Am. J. Phys.
60
, 207
–211
(1992
).11.
Aaron K.
Grant
and
Jonathan L.
Rosner
, “
Classical orbits in power-law potentials
,” Am. J. Phys.
62
, 310
–315
(1994
).12.
Hua
Wu
and
D. W. L.
Sprung
, “
Comment on ‘Classical orbits in power-law potentials
,’” Am. J. Phys.
63
, 564
–567
(1995
).13.
14.
T.
Needham
, “
Newton and the transmutation of force
,” Amer. Math. Mon.
100
, 119
–137
(1993
).15.
Tristan.
Needham
, Visual Complex Analysis
(
Clarendon, Oxford U. P
.,
Oxford
, 1997
), Sec. X.3, p. 244
.16.
P. A.
Horvathy
, “
The laws of planetary motion, derived from those of a harmonic oscillator (following Arnold)
,” arXiv:1404.2265 (2014
).17.
The logarithmic potential is also often associated with scale invariance, i.e., with the
limit of the power-law potential. However, in this potential, an additive constant appears under scaling transformations. Of course, the equations of motion are invariant under such additive constants, but the energy E is not. Thus, the above proof of Hénon's theorem must be modified for the logarithmic potential. One can pass from the logarithmic potential to the limit α = 0 of the power-law if one subtracts a constant which tends to
, however.
18.
Of course, the deeper reason for these perhaps somewhat confusing facts is the existence of the conserved Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector, which exists in the two-body case only and implies a period that depends only on the energy E and not on the angular momentum:
.
19.
The fact that in spite of great attention paid to the two-body problem over the years (centuries), Hénon's theorem was not discovered in that context is testimony to its non-triviality.
20.
A. G.
Magner
,
A. A.
Vlasenko
, and
K.
Arita
, “
Semiclassical trace formula for the two-dimensional radial power-law potentials
,” Phys. Rev. E
87
, 062916
(2013
).21.
This is just a variant of Euler's identity for homogeneous functions.
22.
E. T.
Whittaker
, Analytical Dynamics of Particles
(
Cambridge U. P
.,
Cambridge
, 1959
).23.
R.
Broucke
, “
Notes on the central force rn
,” Astrophys. Space Sci.
72
, 33
–53
(1980
).24.
The α = 4 case was explicitly solved in terms of elliptic functions in the Appendix of Ref. 20.
25.
O. L.
de Lange
and
J.
Pierrus
, Solved Problems in Classical Mechanics
(
Oxford U. P
.,
Oxford
, 2010
).26.
27.
M.
Hénon
, “
A family of periodic solutions of the planar three-body problem, and their stability
,” Celest. Mech.
13
, 267
–285
(1976
).28.
Edward John
Routh
, Dynamics of a System of Rigid Bodies
, 6th ed. (
MacMillan and Co
.,
London
, 1905
).29.
31.
S. R.
Coleman
, “
Dilatations
,” in Aspects of Symmetry
(
Cambridge U. P.
,
Cambridge
, 1985
), pp. 67
–98
.© 2022 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by American Association of Physics Teachers.
2022
Author(s)
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.