We investigate the spontaneous motion of a soap film in a conical geometry connected to a long tube and show how it can be used to measure the dynamic viscosity of air. In contrast to other techniques that are complicated to implement and require expensive and sophisticated equipment, this measurement method relies only on soapy water and three everyday life objects: a smartphone, a funnel, and a hose. More precisely, to determine the viscosity of air, we use a smartphone to record the spontaneous motion of a soap film placed in a funnel when the motion of the film is quasistatic and the flow of air escaping the geometry is viscously dominated. This simple experiment should be of value to undergraduate physics students in learning about effects of both fluid viscosity and surface tension (another fluid property which they could also measure with a smartphone; Goy et al., Phys. Teach. 55, 498–499 (2017)), and the usefulness of reasonable approximations in physics.
REFERENCES
1.
N.-A.
Goy
,
Z.
Denis
,
M.
Lavaud
,
A.
Grolleau
,
N.
Dufour
,
A.
Deblais
, and
U.
Delabre
, “ Surface tension measurements with a
smartphone
,” Phys. Teach.
55
, 498
–499
(2017
).2.
P. G.
de Gennes
,
F.
Brochard-Wyart
, and
D.
Quéré
, Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls,
Waves
( Springer
,
New York
, 2004
).3.
L.
Salkin
,
A.
Schmit
,
P.
Panizza
, and
L.
Courbin
, “ Generating soap bubbles by blowing on soap
films
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
116
, 077801
(2016
).4.
R. M.
Digilov
and
M.
Reiner
, “ Weight-controlled capillary viscometer
,”
Am. J. Phys.
73
(11
),
1020
–1022
(2005
).5.
Y.
Shimokawa
,
Y.
Matsuura
,
T.
Hirano
, and
K.
Sakai
, “ Gas viscosity measurement with diamagnetic-levitation
viscometer based on electromagnetically spinning system
,” Rev.
Sci. Instrum.
87
, 125105
(2016
).6.
M.
Clerget
,
A.
Delvert
,
L.
Courbin
, and
P.
Panizza
, “ Different scenarios of shrinking surface soap
bubbles
,” Am. J. Phys.
89
(3
), 244
–252
(2021
).7.
For a short review on the pressure difference
across a fluid interface (Laplace pressure), see for instance
F.
Behroozi
and
P. S.
Behroozi
, “ Determination of surface tension from the measurement of
internal pressure of mini soap bubbles
,” Am. J. Phys.
79
(11
),
1089
–1093
(2011
).8.
F. D.
Dos Santos
and
T.
Ondarçuhu
, “ Free-running droplets
,” Phys.
Rev. Lett.
75
, 2972
–2975
(1995
).9.
Y.
Sumino
,
N.
Magome
,
T.
Hamada
, and
K.
Yoshikawa
, “ Self-running droplet: Emergence of regular motion from
nonequilibrium noise
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
94
, 068301
(2005
).10.
H.
Linke
,
B. J.
Alemán
,
L. D.
Melling
,
M. J.
Taormina
,
M. J.
Francis
,
C. C.
Dow-Hygelund
,
V.
Narayanan
,
R. P.
Taylor
, and
A.
Stout
, “ Self-propelled Leidenfrost droplets
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
96
, 154502
–154504
(2006
).11.
M. K.
Chaudhury
and
G. M.
Whitesides
, “ How to make water run uphill
,”
Science
256
, 1539
–1541
(1992
).12.
E.
Lorenceau
and
D.
Quéré
, “ Drops on a conical wire
,” J.
Fluid Mech.
510
, 29
–45
(2004
).13.
M.
Reyssat
,
L.
Courbin
,
E.
Reyssat
, and
H. A.
Stone
, “ Imbibition in geometries with axial
variations
,” J. Fluid Mech.
615
, 335
–344
(2008
).14.
P.
Renvoisé
,
J. W. M.
Bush
,
M.
Prakash
, and
D.
Quéré
, “ Drop propulsion in tapered tubes
,”
Europhys. Lett.
86
, 64003
–64005
(2009
).15.
E.
Reyssat
, “ Drops and bubbles in wedges
,” J.
Fluid Mech.
748
, 641
–662
(2014
).16.
L.
Salkin
,
A.
Schmit
,
R.
David
,
A.
Delvert
,
E.
Gicquel
,
P.
Panizza
, and
L.
Courbin
, “ Interfacial bubbles formed by plunging thin liquid films
in a pool
,” Phys. Rev. Fluids
2
, 063604
(2017
).17.
L.
Salkin
,
A.
Schmit
,
P.
Panizza
, and
L.
Courbin
, “ Influence of boundary conditions on the existence and
stability of minimal surfaces of revolution made of soap films
,”
Am. J. Phys.
82
(9
), 839
–847
(2014
).18.
In our experiment, a surface bubble is a
hemispherical bubble sitting on the liquid surface. The formation mechanisms of these
bubbles and the variations of their size with the parameters of the experiment will be
published elsewhere.
19.
See <https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/> for
“information about the free image processing software ImageJ”.
20.
See <http://www.gnuplot.info/> for
“information about the free graphing software Gnuplot”.
21.
For a curved region of a fluid–fluid interface with
typical length scale
,
comparing an estimate of the Laplace pressure
to the hydrostatic
pressure
gives the capillary length
. For length
scales larger than
,
gravity dominates. Otherwise, capillarity prevails over gravity.
22.
D. J.
Ferguson
and
S. J.
Cox
, “ The motion of a foam lamella traversing an idealised
bi-conical pore with a rounded central region
,” Colloids Surf.,
A
438
, 56
–62
(2013
).23.
W. R.
Rossen
, “ Theory of mobilization pressure gradient of flowing foams
in porous media
,” J. Colloid Interface Sci.
136
, 1
–16
(1990
).24.
E.
Guyon
,
J.-P.
Hulin
,
L.
Petit
, and
C. D.
Mitescu
, Physical Hydrodynamics
, 2nd
ed. ( Oxford U. P
.,
Oxford
, 2015
).25.
26.
S.
Gravelle
,
L.
Joly
,
F.
Detcheverry
,
C.
Ybert
,
C.
Cottin-Bizonne
, and
L.
Bocquet
, “ Optimizing water permeability through the hourglass shape
of aquaporins
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
110
(41
),
16367
–16372
(2013
).27.
L.
Courbin
and
H. A.
Stone
, “ Your wetting day
,” Phys.
Today
60
(2
), 84
–85
(2007
).28.
T. E.
Faber
, Fluid Dynamics for Physicists
(
Cambridge U. P
.,
Cambridge
, 1995
).29.
D. P.
Jackson
and
S.
Sleyman
, “ Analysis of a deflating soap bubble
,”
Am. J. Phys.
78
, 990–994
(2010
).30.
L.
Sibaiya
, “ Time of collapse of a soap bubble
,”
Nature
149
, 527
(1942
).31.
Gören
Rämme
, “ Surface tension from deflating a soap
bubble
,” Phys. Educ.
32
, 191
–194
(1997
).© 2022 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by American Association of Physics Teachers.
2022
Author(s)
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
