In 2015, the first observation of gravitational waves marked a breakthrough in astrophysics and in technological research and development. The discovery of a gravitational-wave signal from the collision of two black holes, a billion light-years away, received considerable interest from the media and public. We describe the development of a purpose-built exhibit explaining this new area of research to a general audience. The core element of the exhibit is a working Michelson interferometer: a scaled-down version of the key technology used in gravitational-wave detectors. The Michelson interferometer is integrated into a hands-on exhibit, which allows for user interaction and simulated gravitational-wave observations. An interactive display provides a self-guided explanation of gravitational-wave related topics through video, animation, images, and text. We detail the hardware and software used to create the exhibit, and discuss two installation variants: An independent learning experience in a museum setting (the Thinktank Birmingham Science Museum) and a science-festival with the presence of expert guides (the 2017 Royal Society Summer Science Exhibition). We assess audience reception in these two settings, describe the improvements we have made given this information, and discuss future public-engagement projects resulting from this work. The exhibit is found to be effective in communicating the new and unfamiliar field of gravitational-wave research to general audiences. An accompanying website provides parts lists and information for others to build their own version of this exhibit.
REFERENCES
1.
Albert
Einstein
, “ Approximative integration of the field equations of
gravitation
,” Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math.
Phys.)
1916
, 688
–696
(1916
).2.
B. P.
Abbott
,
R.
Abbott
,
T. D.
Abbott
et al, “ Observation of gravitational waves
from a binary black hole merger
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
116
(6
), 061102
(2016
). 3.
B. P.
Abbott
et al, “ Properties of the binary black hole
merger GW150914
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
116
(24
), 241102
(2016
). 4.
B. P.
Abbott
,
R.
Abbott
,
T. D.
Abbott
et al, “ GWTC-1: A gravitational-wave
transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first
and second observing runs
,” Phys. Rev. X
9
(3
), 031040
(2019
).5.
J.
Aasi
,
B. P.
Abbott
,
R.
Abbott
et al, “ Advanced LIGO
,”
Classical Quantum Gravity
32
(7
), 074001
(2015
).6.
F.
Acernese
et al, “ Advanced Virgo: A second-generation
interferometric gravitational wave detector
,” Classical Quantum
Gravity
32
(2
), 024001
(2015
). 7.
Yoichi
Aso
,
Yuta
Michimura
,
Kentaro
Somiya
et al, “ Interferometer design of the KAGRA
gravitational wave detector
,” Phys. Rev. D
88
(4
), 043007
(2013
).8.
Bala
Iyer
,
Tarun
Souradeep
,
C. S.
Unnikrishnan
et al, “ LIGO-India
,”
Technical report <M1100296-v2 dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-M1100296/public
>
(2011
).9.
B. P.
Abbott
et al, “ GW150914: First results from the
search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO
,”
Phys. Rev. D
93
(12
), 122003
(2016
).10.
B. P.
Abbott
,
R.
Abbott
,
T. D.
Abbott
et al, “ GW151226: Observation of
gravitational waves from a 22-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
116
(24
), 241103
(2016
). 11.
B. P.
Abbott
,
R.
Abbott
,
T. D.
Abbott
et al, “ GW170104: Observation of a
50-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence at redshift 0.2
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
118
(22
), 221101
(2017
). 12.
B. P.
Abbott
et al, “ GW170608: Observation of a
19-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence
,” Astrophys.
J.
851
(2
), L35
(2017
). 13.
B. P.
Abbott
,
R.
Abbott
,
T. D.
Abbott
et al, “ GW170814: A three-detector
observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole
coalescence
,” Phys. Rev. Lett.
119
(14
), 141101
(2017
). 14.
B. P.
Abbott
,
R.
Abbott
,
T. D.
Abbott
et al, “ GW170817: Observation of
gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral
,” Phys.
Rev. Lett.
119
(16
), 161101
(2017
). 15.
B. P.
Abbott
et al, “ GW190425: Observation of a compact
binary coalescence with total mass
,” Astrophys. J. Lett.
892
(1
), L3
(2020
).16.
R.
Abbott
et al, “ GW190412: Observation of a
binary-black-hole coalescence with asymmetric masses
,” Phys.
Rev. D
102
(4
), 43015
(2020
).17.
R.
Abbott
et al, “ GW190521: A binary black hole
merger with a total mass of
GW190521
,” Phys. Rev.
Lett.
125
(10
), 101102
(2020
).18.
R.
Abbott
et al, “ GW190814: Gravitational waves from
the coalescence of a 23 solar mass black hole with a 2.6 solar mass compact
object
,” Astrophys. J. Lett.
896
(2
), L44
(2020
). 19.
20.
“Virgo Collaboration educational resources,”
<public.virgo-gw.eu/educational-resources/>.
21.
“Laser Labs games and apps,” <www.laserlabs.org>.
22.
L.
Carbone
,
C.
Bond
,
D.
Brown
et al, “ Computer-games for gravitational
wave science outreach: Black hole pong and space time quest
,” J.
Phys.: Conf. Ser.
363
, 012057
(2012
).23.
“Institiute for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
outreach,” <www.sr.bham.ac.uk/gwgroup/outreach.php>.
24.
Larry E.
Suter
, “ Visiting science museums during middle and high school: A
longitudinal analysis of student performance in science
,” Sci.
Educ.
98
(5
), 815
–839
(2014
). 25.
Neta
Shaby
,
Orit Ben-Zvi
Assaraf
, and
Tali
Tal
, “ I know how it works!' student engagement with exhibits in
a science museum
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., Part B
9
(3
), 233
–252
(2019
).26.
Katherine P.
Dabney
,
Robert H.
Tai
,
John T.
Almarode
et al, “ Out-of-school time science
activities and their association with career interest in stem
,”
Int. J. Sci. Educ., Part B
2
(1
), 63
–79
(2012
).27.
Paichi P.
Shein
,
John H.
Falk
, and
Yuh-Yuh
Li
, “ The role of science identity in science center visits and
effects
,” Sci. Educ.
103
(6
),
1478
–1492
(2019
).28.
Anthony
Lelliott
, “ Understanding gravity: The role of a school visit to a
science centre
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., Part B
4
(4
), 305
–322
(2014
). 29.
J.
Falk
and
L.
Dierking
, Learing from Museums
(
Rowman & Littlefield
, Lanham,
MD
, 2000
).30.
John H.
Falk
and
Mark D.
Needham
, “ Measuring the impact of a science center on its
community
,” J. Res. Sci. Teaching
48
(1
), 1
–12
(2011
).31.
John H.
Falk
and
Lynn D.
Dierking
, “ School field trips: Assessing their long-term
impact
,” Curator: Museum J.
40
(3
), 211
–218
(1997
). 32.
Marco
Cavaglia
,
Martin
Hendry
,
Szabolcs
Márka
,
David H.
Reitze
, and
Keith
Riles
, “ Astronomy's new messengers: A traveling exhibit on
gravitational-wave physics
,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
203
, 012115
(2009
).33.
Sam
Cooper
,
Anna
Green
, and
Hannah
Middelton
. “ Michelson exhibit website
,” <www.sr.bham.ac.uk/exhibit/>.34.
Sam
Cooper
,
Anna
Green
,
Hannah
Middleton
, and
Christopher
Berry
, “scooper93/gwexhibit: Initial release of gravitational wave exhibit,
October 2020
,” <https://zenodo.org/record/4066744>.35.
Bond
Charlotte
,
Brown
Daniel
,
Freise
Andreas
, and
Strain
Kenneth
, “ Interferometer techniques for gravitational-wave
detection
,” Living Rev. Rel.
19
, 1
–81
(2016
).36.
Thor Labs,
“Michelson
interferometer educational kit.”37.
Particle Toys Nikhef, “
Nikhef interferometer
.”38.
Dennis
Ugolini
,
Hanna
Rafferty
,
Max
Winter
,
Carsten
Rockstuhl
, and
Antje
Bergmann
, “ Ligo analogy lab-a set of undergraduate lab experiments
to demonstrate some principles of gravitational wave detection
,”
Am. J. Phys.
87
(1
), 44
–56
(2019
).39.
P. J.
Fox
,
R. E.
Scholten
,
M. R.
Walkiewicz
, and
R. E.
Drullinger
, “ A reliable, compact, and low-cost Michelson wavemeter for
laser wavelength measurement
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
(7
), 624
–630
(1999
).40.
Bob
Peart
, “ Impact of exhibit type on knowledge gain, attitudes, and
behavior
,” Curator: Museum J.
27
(3
), 220
–237
(1984
).41.
Dorothy Lozowski
Boisvert
and
Brenda Jochums
Slez
, “ The relationship between exhibit characteristics and
learning-associated behaviors in a science museum discovery space
,”
Sci. Educ.
79
(5
), 503
–518
(1995
).42.
John H.
Falk
and
Leslie M.
Adelman
, “ Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest
on aquarium visitor learning
,” J. Res. Sci. Teaching
40
(2
), 163
–176
(2003
).43.
Falk
John
, “ The director's cut: Toward an improved understanding of
learning from museums
,” Sci. Educ.
88
(S1
), S83
–S96
(2004
).44.
John H.
Falk
,
Carol
Scott
,
Lynn
Dierking
,
Leonie
Rennie
, and
Mika Cohen
Jones
, “ Interactives and visitor learning
,”
Curator: Museum J.
47
(2
), 171
–198
(2004
).45.
Jennifer A.
Fredricks
,
Tara
Hofkens
,
Ming-Te
Wang
,
Elizabeth
Mortenson
, and
Paul
Scott
, “ Supporting girls' and boys' engagement in math and
science learning: A mixed methods study
,” J. Res. Sci.
Teaching
55
(2
), 271
–298
(2018
). 46.
John J.
Koran
, Jr.
,
Mary Lou
Koran
, and
Sarah J.
Longino
, “ The relationship of age, sex, attention, and holding
power with two types of science exhibits
,” Curator: Museum
J.
29
(3
), 227
–235
(1986
).47.
Toni
Dancstep (Née Dancu)
and
Lisa
Sindorf
, “ Exhibit designs for girls' engagement
(edge)
,” Curator: Museum J.
61
(3
), 485
–506
(2018
).48.
Cody
Sandifer
, “ Technological novelty and open-endedness: Two
characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor
attention in a science museum
,” J. Res. Sci. Teaching
40
(2
), 121
–137
(2003
). 49.
J.
Falk
and
L.
Dierking
, The Museum Experience Revisited
(
Routledge
, New York
,
2013
).50.
Robin
Meisner
,
Dirk
vom Lehn
,
Christian
Heath
et al, “ Exhibiting performance:
Co-participation in science centres and museums
,” Int. J. Sci.
Educ.
29
(12
),
1531
–1555
(2007
). 51.
Constanze
Hampp
and
Stephan
Schwan
, “ The role of authentic objects in museums of the history
of science and technology: Findings from a visitor study
,” Int.
J. Sci. Educ., Part B
5
(2
), 161
–181
(2015
). 52.
D.
Ingram
and LIGO Scientific Collaboration,
“ Build
your own michelson interferometer
,” LIGO Public Document No. T1400762
<dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1400762/public> (2014
).53.
E.
Douglas
and LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
“ The
magnetic michelson interferometer
,” LIGO Public Document No. T0900393
<dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T0900393/public> (2009
).54.
Blender Online Community,
“
Blender—A 3D modelling and rendering package
,” Blender
Foundation, Stichting Blender Foundation, Amsterdam, the
Netherlands
(2019
).55.
Luisa
Massarani
,
Lara Mucci
Poenaru
,
Jessica Norberto
Rocha
,
Shawn
Rowe
, and
Sigrid
Falla
, “ Adolescents learning with exhibits and explainers: The
case of maloka
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., Part B
9
(3
), 253
–267
(2019
).56.
Sue
Allen
and
Joshua
Gutwill
, “ Designing with multiple interactives: Five common
pitfalls
,” Curator: Museum J.
47
(2
), 199
–212
(2004
). 57.
Bruce
Wyman
,
Scott
Smith
,
Daniel
Meyers
, and
Michael
Godfrey
, “ Digital storytelling in museums: Observations and best
practices
,” Curator: Museum J.
54
(4
), 461
–468
(2011
). 58.
Minda
Borun
and
Jennifer
Dritsas
, “ Developing family-friendly exhibits
,”
Curator: Museum J.
40
(3
), 178
–196
(1997
).59.
Toni
Dancstep (Née Dancu)
and
Lisa
Sindorf
, “ Creating a female-responsive design framework for stem
exhibits
,” Curator: Museum J.
61
(3
), 469
–484
(2018
).60.
61.
62.
Keith
Riles
, “ Recent searches for continuous gravitational
waves
,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A
32
(39
), 1730035
(2017
).63.
B. P.
Abbott
,
R.
Abbott
,
T. D.
Abbott
et al, “ First targeted search for
gravitational-wave bursts from core-collapse supernovae in data of first-generation
laser interferometer detectors
,” Phys. Rev. D
94
(10
), 102001
(2016
). 64.
“reveal.js—The HTML Presentation Framework,”
<revealjs.com>.
65.
“Socket IO,” <socket.io>.
66.
“Johnny-Five: The JavaScript Robotics & IoT
Platform,” <johnny-five.io>.
67.
John H.
Falk
,
John J.
Koran
, and
Lynn D.
Dierking
, “ The things of science: Assessing the learning potential
of science museums
,” Sci. Educ.
70
(5
), 503
–508
(1986
). 68.
“Thinktank Birmingham Science Museum,”
<www.birminghammuseums.org.uk/thinktank>
(
2018
).69.
Lauren
Deere
, Private communication, October 2018.70.
Anna
Green
, “ Gravitational waves in the Birmingham science
museum
,” LIGO Mag.
9
, 20
–21
(2016
).71.
University of Birmingham
, “
Birmingham's role in gravitational wave detection celebrated in thinktank
exhibit
,” <www.birmingham.ac.uk/news/latest/2016/07/Birmingham%27s-role-in-gravitational-wave-detection-celebrated-in-Thinktank-exhibit.aspx>
(2016
).72.
Thinktank Birmingham Science Museum,
“Exhibition design and construction guidelines,” Internal Document for
Exhibitors
(2011
).73.
National Museums of Scotland,
Exhibitions for All: A Practical Guide to Designing Inclusive
Exhibitions
( NMS Publishing Ltd
.,
Edinburgh
, 2002
) <www.rnib.org.uk/sites/default/files/Exhibitions_for_all_NMScotland.pdf>.74.
“Color Oracle,” <colororacle.org>
(
2018
).75.
British Dyslexia Association
, “
Dyslexia style guide 2018: Creating dyslexia
,” Friendly
Content <www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/employer/dyslexia-style-guide-2018-creating-dyslexia-friendly-content>
(2018
).76.
British Dyslexia Association
, “
Typefaces for dyslexia
,” <bdatech.org/what-technology/typefaces-for-dyslexia/>
(2018
).77.
Louis S.
Nadelson
, “ Who is watching and who is playing: Parental engagement
with children at a hands-on science center
,” J. Educ.
Res.
106
(6
), 478
–484
(2013
). 78.
79.
Jill
Hohenstein
and
Lynn Uyen
Tran
, “ Use of questions in exhibit labels to generate
explanatory conversation among science museum visitors
,” Int. J.
Sci. Educ.
29
(12
),
1557
–1580
(2007
).80.
“Royal Society Summer Exhibition,” <royalsociety.org/science-events-and-lectures/2017/summer-science-exhibition>
(
2017
).81.
LIGO Scienitifc Collaboration universities and
institutions at RSSE: University of Birmingham, Imperial College London, University of
Glasgow, Cardiff University, University of the West of Scotland, University of
Southampton, University of Sheffield, AEI Hannover, AEI Potsdam–Golm, Milde
Marketing.
82.
RSSE
“ Listen to
Einstein's Universe
” <page. royalsociety.org/science-events-and-lectures/2017/summer-science-exhibition/exhibits/listening-to-einsteins-universe>.83.
“Listen to the Universe” dedicated website
<www.listen2theuniverse.org>.
84.
85.
The Royal Society,
“
Royal society—Reasons to exhibit
,” <royalsociety.org/science-events-and-lectures/2017/summer-science-exhibition/proposals/reasons-to-exhibit/>.86.
Royal Society
, “
Guidelines for school groups
,” <royalsociety.org/science-events-and-lectures/2017/summer-science-exhibition/schools-colleges/>
(2017
).87.
88.
89.
Events where Gravity Synth
has featured include: BBC's Digital Planet 18th birthday sho
w (2019) (Ref.
93), Cheltenham Science Festival (2019), Lunar
Festival (2018), Future Everything (2018), The Superposition (2017), Pint of Science
(2017), and the Interact Engagement Symposium (2017).90.
91.
92.
Benjamin P.
Abbott
et al, “ The basic physics of the binary
black hole merger GW150914
,” Ann. Phys.
529
(1-2
), 1600209
(2017
).93.
“Digital Planet's 18th birthday show,”
<www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3cszbwy> (
2019
).© 2021 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by American Association of Physics Teachers.
2021
Author(s)
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
