Many different formalisms exist for computing the phase of a matter-wave interferometer. However, it can be challenging to develop physical intuition about what a particular interferometer is actually measuring or about whether a given classical measurement provides equivalent information. Here, we investigate the physical content of the interferometer phase through a series of thought experiments. In low-order potentials, a matter-wave interferometer with a single internal state provides the same information as a sum of position measurements of a classical test object. In high-order potentials, the interferometer phase becomes decoupled from the motion of the interferometer arms, and the phase contains information that cannot be obtained by any set of position measurements on the interferometer trajectory. This phase shift in a high-order potential fundamentally distinguishes matter-wave interferometers from classical measuring devices.
REFERENCES
The action S of a trajectory x(t) in the time interval is defined to be where is the Lagrangian of the system. Physically, the action is proportional to the proper time evolved along the trajectory (Ref. 21).
Unlike the classical accelerometer, the interferometer does not provide information about the three position measurements individually.
It is worth emphasizing that there is no fundamental physical difference between “open” interferometers and “closed” interferometers (in which the central trajectories of the two arms overlap at the time of the final beamsplitter). In order to observe first-order coherence in a particular region, the probability density must have the form Here, ψ1 and ψ2 represent the amplitudes of the wavefunction on two different trajectories, and the phenomenon of interference is represented by the terms and . The interference terms are zero unless the region contains nonzero amplitude from both trajectories. Physically speaking, every interferometer is closed. The notion of an “open” interferometer is useful only insofar as it indicates the parametric dependence of physical observables, e.g., the dependence of the interferometer phase on initial conditions.
To be precise, cancels the boundary term that appears when is integrated by parts. See Sec. V for further details.
This approximation, which is used to simplify the calculation, is not necessary for the result. The same result is obtained if the light pulses occur over finite intervals (Ref. 15) as long as the motion of the arms during the light pulses is taken into account.