Using a strong cooperative learning structure, an inquiry-based course Fire & Ice for non-science majors addresses the concepts of heat and temperature, as well as the historical development of these ideas. A coherent line of inquiry is developed based on the particulate nature of matter which guides students in constructing the concepts of kinetic molecular theory, absolute zero, thermal equilibrium, thermal conduction, energy conservation, and energy degradation. This is accomplished by interleaving hands-on explorations, question-based team discussions, data sharing, and whole class reviews. Student performance on an established thermal concept inventory shows significant improvement. Students also provided more mechanistic and detailed descriptions even as they struggle with precision of language. They perceived this course as different, challenging, accessible, social, and true to the label “inquiry.” A complete video and materials record of the course is available at the UNH Scholars Repository.
References
1.
M.
Arnold
and R.
Millar
, “Children's and lay adults' views about thermal equilibrium
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
16
(4
), 405
–419
(1994
).2.
P. G.
Jasien
and G. E.
Oberem
, “Understanding of elementary concepts in heat and temperature among college students and K-12 teachers
,” J. Chem. Educ.
79
(7
), 889
–895
(2002
).3.
C. E.
Laburu
and M.
Niaz
, “A Lakatosian framework to analyze situations of cognitive conflict and controversy in students' understanding of heat and temperature
,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol.
11
(3
), 211
–219
(2002
).4.
G.
Chiou
and O. R.
Anderson
, “A study of undergraduate physics students' understanding of heat conduction based on mental model theory and an ontology-process analysis
,” Sci. Educ.
94
(5
), 825
–854
(2010
).5.
S.
Freeman
, S. L.
Eddy
, M.
McDonough
, M. K.
Smith
, N.
Okoroafor
, H.
Jordt
, and M. P.
Wenderoth
, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
111
, 8410
–8415
(2014
).6.
C. F.
Bauer
, “Windows on the inquiry classroom: Full course, instructor-and-apprentice-annotated video for professional development in STEM inquiry teaching
,” National Science Foundation Grant DUE-1245730.7.
Physics by Inquiry: A Video Resource
, WGBH Boston Public Radio
, <http://main.wgbh.org/wgbh/learn/instructional/physics.html>.8.
L. C.
McDermott
, “Heat and temperature
,” in Physics by Inquiry: Vol 1
(John Wiley & Sons
, New York
, 1996
).9.
Chris
Bauer
, UNH Scholars Repository, <https://scholars.unh.edu/>.10.
National Research Council
, Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning
(The National Academies Press
, Washington, DC
, 2000
), p. 29
.11.
R.
Karplus
and H. D.
Their
, A New Look at Elementary School Science
(Rand McNally
, Chicago
, 1967
).12.
POGIL: An Introduction to Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning for those Who Wish to Empower Learners
, edited by S. R.
Simonson
(Stylus Publishing
, Herndon, VA
, 2019
).13.
L.
Wheeler
and R.
Bell
, “Open-ended inquiry: Practical ways of implementing inquiry in the chemistry classroom
,” Sci. Teach.
79
(6
), 32
–39
(2012
).14.
D. Z.
Meyer
, J.
Kukarek-Sandor
, J.
Kedvesh
, C.
Heitzman
, Y.
Pan
, and S.
Faik
, “Eight ways to do inquiry: A study of over 300 inquiry activities recommends eight models for the classroom
,” Sci. Teach.
79
(6
), 40
–44
(2012
).15.
F.
Goldberg
, V.
Otero
, and S.
Robinson
, “Design principles for effective physics instruction: A case from physics and everyday thinking
,” Am. J. Phys.
78
(12
), 1265
–1277
(2010
).16.
F.
Goldberg
and S.
Bendall
, “Making the invisible visible: A teaching/learning environment that builds on a new view of the physics learner
,” Am. J. Phys.
63
(11
), 978
–991
(1995
).17.
G.
Wiggins
and J.
McTighe
, Understanding by Design
(Merrill Prentice Hall
, Upper Saddle River, NJ
, 1998
).18.
D.
Fortus
, L. M.
Sutherland Adams
, J.
Krajcik
, and B.
Reiser
, “Assessing the role of curriculum coherence in student learning about energy
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
52
(10
), 1408
–1425
(2015
).19.
Y.
Shwartz
, A.
Weizman
, D.
Fortus
, J.
Krajcik
, and B.
Reiser
, “The IQWST experience: Using coherence as a design principle for a middle school science curriculum
,” Elem. Sch. J.
109
(2
), 199
–219
(2008
).20.
E. E.
Clough
and R.
Driver
, “Secondary students' conceptions of the conduction of heat: Bringing together scientific and personal views
,” Phys. Educ.
20
, 176
–182
(1985
).21.
E. L.
Lewis
and M. C.
Linn
, “Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
31
(6
), 657
–678
(1994
).22.
S.
Yeo
and M.
Zadnik
, “Introductory thermal concept evaluation: Assessing students' understanding
,” Phys. Teach.
39
, 496
–504
(2001
).23.
E.
Adadan
and M. N.
Yavuzkaya
, “Examining the progression and consistency of thermal concepts: A cross-age study
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
40
(4
), 371
–396
(2018
).24.
S. C.
Nurrenbern
and M.
Pickering
, “Concept learning versus problem solving: Is there a difference?
,” J. Chem. Educ.
64
(6
), 508
–510
(1987
).25.
B. A.
Sawrey
, “Concept learning versus problem solving: Revisited
,” J. Chem. Educ.
67
(3
), 253
–254
(1990
).26.
C. A.
Bridle
and E. J.
Yezierski
, “Evidence for the effectiveness of inquiry-based, particulate-level instruction on conceptions of the particulate nature of matter
,” J. Chem. Educ.
89
, 192
–198
(2012
).27.
M.
Reiner
, J. D.
Slotta
, M. T. H.
Chi
, and L. B.
Resnick
, “Naïve physics reasoning: A commitment to substance-based conceptions
,” Cognit. Instruct.
18
(1
), 1
–34
(2000
).28.
D. E.
Meltzer
, “Investigation of students' reasoning regarding heat, work, and the first law of thermodynamics in an introductory calculus-based general physics course
,” Am. J. Phys.
72
, 1432
–1446
(2004
).29.
R.
Shabay
and B. A.
Sherwood
, “Bringing atoms into first-year physics
,” Am. J. Phys.
67
, 1045
–1050
(1999
).30.
L.
Ding
, R.
Shabay
, and B.
Sherwood
, “How do students in an innovative principle-based mechanics course understand energy concepts?
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
50
(6
), 722
–747
(2013
).31.
M.
Wiser
and T.
Amin
, “‘Is heat hot?’ Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermal phenomena
,” Learn. Instr.
11
, 331
–355
(2001
).32.
C. F.
Herrmann-Abell
and G. E.
DeBoer
, “Investigating a learning progression for energy ideas from upper elementary through high school
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
55
(1
), 68
–93
(2018
).33.
C. L.
Smith
, M.
Wiser
, C. W.
Anderson
, and J.
Krajcik
, “Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory
,” Meas.: Interdisciplinary Res. Perspect.
14
(1–2
), 1
–98
(2006
).34.
M. C.
Linn
and N. B.
Songer
, “Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: What are appropriate cognitive demands?
,” J. Res. Sci. Teach.
28
(10
), 885
–918
(1991
).35.
PhET Interactive Simulations
, “Gas properties
,” <https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/legacy/gas-properties>.36.
M. F.
Thomaz
, I. M.
Malaquias
, M. C.
Valente
, and M. J.
Antunes
, Phys. Educ.
30
, 19
–26
(1995
).37.
K.
Carlton
, “Teaching about heat and temperature
,” Phys. Educ.
35
(2
), 101
–105
(2000
).38.
R. L.
Lehrman
, “Energy is not the ability to do work
,” Phys. Teach.
11
, 15
–18
(1973
).39.
K. C.
deBerg
, “The concepts of heat and temperature: The problem of determining the content for the construction of an historical case study which is sensitive to the nature of science issues and teaching-learning issues
,” Sci. Educ.
17
, 75
–114
(2008
).40.
H.
Seker
and B. G.
Guney
, “History of science in the physics curriculum: A directed content analysis of historical sources
,” Sci. Educ.
21
, 683
–703
(2012
).41.
E.
Hazzard
, “Now you're cooking!: Heat transfer labs: From basic recipes to full inquiry
,” Sci. Teach.
79
(6
), 45
–50
(2012
).42.
R. W.
Ricci
and M. A.
Ditzler
, “Discovery chemistry: A laboratory-centered approach to teaching general chemistry
,” J. Chem. Educ.
68
(3
), 228
–231
(1991
).43.
G.
Segre
, A Matter of Degrees: What Temperature Reveals about the Past and Future of Our Species, Planet, and Universe
(Penquin Books
, New York
, 2002
).44.
C.
Schnittka
and R.
Bell
, “Engineering design and conceptual change in science: Addressing thermal energy and heat transfer in eighth grade
,” Int. J. Sci. Educ.
33
(13
), 1861
–1887
(2011
).45.
B. C.
Madu
and E.
Orji
, “Effects of cognitive conflict instructional strategy on students' conceptual change in temperature and heat
,” Sage Open, July–Sept 1–9 (2015
).46.
R.
Amalia
, I. M.
Sari
, and P.
Sinaga
, “Students' mental model on heat convection concept and its relation with students conception on heat and temperature
,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
812
, 012092
(2017
).47.
E. J.
Yezierski
and J. P.
Birk
, “Misconceptions about the particulate nature of matter: Using animations to close the gender gap
,” J. Chem. Educ.
83
(6
), 954
–960
(2006
).48.
J.
Haglund
, S.
Andersson
, and M.
Elmgren
, “Language aspects of engineering students' view of entropy
,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.
17
, 489
–508
(2016
).© 2019 American Association of Physics Teachers.
2019
American Association of Physics Teachers
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.
