The gravitational field of a massive, filamentary ring is considered. We provide an analytic expression for the gravitational potential and demonstrate that the exact gravitational potential and its gradient—the gravitational force-field—is not central. Hence, it is a good candidate to discuss the difference between the concepts of center of mass and center of gravity. We focus on other consequences of reduced symmetry, e.g., only the z-component of the angular momentum is conserved. However, the remnant high symmetry of this system also ensures that there are special classes of motions which are restricted to invariant subspaces; thus, depending on the initial condition, the dynamics of a point particle is integrable. We also show that periodic orbits in the equatorial plane external to the ring are possible, but only if the angular momentum is above a threshold value. In this case, the orbits are stable.
References
In all textbooks cited before, all mentions are that in a uniform gravitational field, the center of mass and center of gravity coincide. While this practice is defensible from the view of practicality, we feel that pedagogically is questionable: an exceptional case (point particle or perfectly spherical objects) is taught. Only Ref. 6, among the already cited textbooks, treats non-uniform mass distribution, and non-spherical bodies explicitly in a subsection.
An even simpler approach would be to first substitute into the expression of the gravitational potential and obtain and then differentiate this expression twice and solve the equation for .
For the sake of completeness we provide here the exact expression for the period in terms of the complete elliptic integrals of the first, second, and third kind, K, E, and Π, respectively. Their definitions can be found in Byrd and Friedman.23 The power series expansion of this exact expression, up to the second order, agrees with that of given in the text, , but derived from a hand-waving argument.