The difference between “beating” and “pushing” results in the perception that a push just makes an object move as a whole, while a beat also produces a sound. Through a detailed analysis of the physics underlying such everyday experiences, we identify the strength, the duration, and the softness of the applied contact force as the main (measurable) characteristics that mark such a difference. The strength determines the final velocity Δv achieved by the body. The duration 2τ corresponds to the time τ the sound takes to cross the body. The softness γ (a positive exponent) results from the shape in time of the contact force. These three elements make up the formula for the intensity of the sound produced. The relevant role of the softness is stressed and specific values are calculated for a thin metallic bar, which is chosen as the simplest possible model system.

1.
A. H.
Benade
,
Fundamentals of Musical Acoustics
(
Dover Publication, Inc.
,
New York
,
1990
), pp.
73
106
.
2.
M. E.
Belardinelli
,
A.
Bizzarri
, and
M.
Cocco
, “
Earthquake triggering by static and dynamic contact force changes
,”
J. Geophys. Res.
108
(
B3
),
2135
2151
, https://doi.10.1029/2002JB001779 (
2003
).
3.
W. J.
Strong
,
Impact Mechanics
(
Cambridge U.P.
,
Cambridge
,
2004
), pp.
21
34
.
4.
C.
Lakshmama Rao
,
V.
Narayanamurthy
, and
K. R. Y.
Simha
,
Applied Impact Mechanics
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
2016
), pp.
35
54
.
5.
Red Cross
, “
The bounce of a ball
,”
Am. J. Phys.
67
,
222
227
(
1999
).
6.
J.-Y.
Chastaing
,
E.
Bertin
, and
J.-C.
Geminard
, “
Dynamics of a bouncing ball
,”
Am. J. Phys.
83
,
518
524
(
2015
).
7.
R. L.
Bisplinghoff
,
G.
Isakson
, and
T. H. H.
Pian
, “
Methods in transient contact force analysis
,”
J. Aeronaut. Sci.
17
,
259
270
(
1950
).
8.
R. L.
Bigsplinghoff
and
H.
Ashley
,
Principles of Aeroelasticity
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
,
1962
), pp
18
40
.
9.
In a real bar, both kn and ωn are bounded from above by the Debye wave vector kD1/d and Debye frequency ckD, d being a typical interatomic distance. Here, we assume that these values are very large compared with all other quantities of interest.
10.
The second equality in Eq. (7) follows from the well-known identity j=δ(x+2jπ)=n=cos(nx)/(2π).
11.
H.
Hertz
, “
On the contact of elastic solids
,”
J. Reine Angewandte Matematik
92
,
157
171
(
1881
);
Translated in English in
Hertz's Miscellaneous Papers
(
Macmillan & Co.
,
London
,
1896
), Chap. 5.
12.
G. C.
McLaskey
and
S. D.
Glaser
, “
Hertzian impact: Experimental study of the force pulse and resulting stress wave
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
128
,
1087
1096
(
2010
).
13.
S. C.
Hunter
, “
Energy adsorbed by elastic waves during impact
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
5
,
162
171
(
1957
).
14.
J.
Reed
, “
Energy losses due to elastic wave propagation during an elastic impact
,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
18
,
2329
2337
(
1985
).
15.
Though we have not found any explicit reference to a softness parameter value α0 = 2, the following work reports numerical fits that could support such time-quadratic incipient contact:
J. E.
Grady
, “
Contact forces hystory and dynamic response due to the impact of a soft projectile
,” NASA Technical Memorandum 100961 (
1988
), Fig. 5—https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19880017295.pdf.
16.
In case (d), recall that sin2φ/2=(1cosφ)/2.
17.
It is left to the reader to show that Eq. (17) can be obtained from Eq. (8), or Eq. (11a), in the limit ω0, without needing the series expansions Eq. (15).
18.
Euler's Gamma Function extends the factorial iteration rule n!=n(n1)! to a functional relationship Γ(z+1)=zΓ(z), in the whole complex plane. Tabulated values and formulas for Γ(z) can be found, for instance, in Ref. 19. A wide literature also exists on the web.
19.
I. S.
Gradshteyn
and
I. M.
Ryzhik
,
Table of Integrals, Series and Products
(
Academic Press, Inc.
,
London
,
1965
), pp.
1045
1053
.
20.
Riemann's Zeta Function represents an amazing mathematical object, when analytically extended to the whole complex plane. Among other subtleties, it contains Riemann's Hypothesis, one of the still unsolved problems in Mathematics.
21.
A.
Akay
, “
A review of impact noise
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
64
,
977
987
(
1978
).
22.
A.
Akay
and
T.
Hodgson
, “
Sound radiation from an accelerated or decelerated sphere
,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
63
,
313
318
(
1978
).
24.
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
, 63rd ed., edited by
R. C.
Weast
and
M. J.
Astle
(
CRC Press, Inc
.,
Boca Raton, Florida
,
1983
).
25.
R. P.
Baumann
and
H. L.
Cockerham
, “
Pressure of an ideal gas on a moving piston
,”
Am. J. Phys.
37
,
675
679
(
1969
).
26.
E. A.
Gislason
, “
A close examination of the motion of an adiabatic piston
,”
Am. J. Phys.
78
,
995
1001
(
2010
).
27.
It is obvious that the very small effect of Patm, on the bar at rest and unforced, has been neglected.
29.
Apart from the critical case α0 = 0 (Fig. 1(a)), corresponding to a hard contact. In this case, the sound intensity turns out to be independent of the length L.
30.
For the passage from Eq. (A4) to Eqs. (A5), use can be made of Mathematica (simply by typing the series as in Eq. (A4)), as an alternative to applying the definition of the generalized Hypergeometric function in Ref. 19.
32.
See, for instance, Ref. 5, Section IV, Fig. 2.
AAPT members receive access to the American Journal of Physics and The Physics Teacher as a member benefit. To learn more about this member benefit and becoming an AAPT member, visit the Joining AAPT page.