The difference between “beating” and “pushing” results in the perception that a push just makes an object move as a whole, while a beat also produces a sound. Through a detailed analysis of the physics underlying such everyday experiences, we identify the strength, the duration, and the softness of the applied contact force as the main (measurable) characteristics that mark such a difference. The strength determines the final velocity Δv achieved by the body. The duration 2τ corresponds to the time τℓ the sound takes to cross the body. The softness γ (a positive exponent) results from the shape in time of the contact force. These three elements make up the formula for the intensity of the sound produced. The relevant role of the softness is stressed and specific values are calculated for a thin metallic bar, which is chosen as the simplest possible model system.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2019
PAPERS|
November 01 2019
Why pushing a bell does not produce a sound
Loris Ferrari
Loris Ferrari
a)
Department of Physics and Astronomy (DIFA) of the University via Irnerio
, 46 - 40126 Bologna, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Electronic mail: [email protected]; Tel.: ++39-051-2091136.
Am. J. Phys. 87, 901–909 (2019)
Article history
Received:
February 28 2019
Accepted:
August 16 2019
Citation
Loris Ferrari; Why pushing a bell does not produce a sound. Am. J. Phys. 1 November 2019; 87 (11): 901–909. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5124976
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
881
Views
Citing articles via
All objects and some questions
Charles H. Lineweaver, Vihan M. Patel
Exact solutions for the inverse problem of the time-independent Schrödinger equation
Bhavika Bhalgamiya, Mark A. Novotny
In this issue: January 2025
Joanna Behrman, Pierre-François Cohadon, et al.
Introductory learning of quantum probability and quantum spin with physical models and observations
Anastasia Lonshakova, Kyla Adams, et al.
Playing with active matter
Angelo Barona Balda, Aykut Argun, et al.
Erratum: “All objects and some questions” [Am. J. Phys. 91, 819–825 (2023)]
Charles H. Lineweaver, Vihan M. Patel
Related Content
A Measurement of g Using Alexander's Diving Bell
The Physics Teacher (September 2010)
Improved Bell-in-a-Bell-Jar Demonstration
The Physics Teacher (May 2003)
John S. Bell’s concept of local causality
Am. J. Phys. (December 2011)
The EPR paradox, Bell’s inequality, and the question of locality
American Journal of Physics (January 2010)
EPR, Bell, and quantum locality
Am. J. Phys. (September 2011)